Planning and preparing expected and unexpected movements: reexamining the relationships of arm, direction, and extent of movement.

Using variations of the movement precue method, this study sought to define the operational characteristics of motoric decisions that govern the planning and preparation of arm, direction, and extent of movement. Experiment 1 examined how these parameters are programmed when the precue method does not confound motoric and nonmotoric decision processes. Experiment 2 examined how an already planned and prepared response is modified (reprogrammed) when an unexpected response must be executed in its place. The collective results of both experiments demonstrated that (a) these parameters were planned and prepared in a specific order; knowledge about direction was necessary for the programming of arm or extent; (b) arm and extent were reprogrammed independently from direction but changes in direction caused all parameters to be reprogrammed, and (c) programming and reprogramming processes operated in a parallel mode when two or more parameters were involved. The results also showed that these parameters were organized within a hierarchical structure. The present findings were discussed in relation to those reported in previous precue studies and existing models of response programming.

[1]  E. Megaw Possible modification to a rapid on-going programmed manual response. , 1974, Brain research.

[2]  J. Yellott,et al.  A cueing technique in choice reaction tlme , 1970 .

[3]  B. Kerr,et al.  Task Factors That Influence Selection and Preparation for Voluntary Movements , 1978 .

[4]  S T Klapp,et al.  Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles. , 1977, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  The specification of digit and duration during motor programming: a new method of precueing. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  H Zelaznik,et al.  Precueing response factors in choice reaction time: a word of caution. , 1978, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Temporal compatibility in dual motor tasks II: Simultaneous articulation and hand movements , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[9]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses , 1982 .

[10]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  The effects of force and direction uncertainty of choice reaction time in an isometric force production task. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  S T Klapp,et al.  The memory drum theory after twenty years: comments on Henry's note. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  David Goodman,et al.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. , 1980 .

[14]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Preprogramming, programming and reprogramming of aimed hand movements as a function of age. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  A. Greenwald,et al.  A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  D. Rosenbaum The Movement Precuing Technique: Assumptions, Applications, and Extensions , 1983 .

[17]  W. O. Shaffer,et al.  Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  E. Megaw Direction and extent uncertainty in step-input tracking. , 1972, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[22]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[23]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[24]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.