Locating and protecting critical reserve sites to minimize expected and worst-case losses

There has been much recent interest in the development of systematic reserve selection methods that are capable of incorporating uncertainty associated with site destruction. This paper makes a contribution to this line of research by presenting two different optimization models for minimizing species losses within a planning region. Given limited acquisition budgets, the first minimizes expected species losses over all possible site loss patterns outside the reserve network while the second minimizes maximum species losses following the worst-case loss of a restricted subset of nonreserve sites. By incorporating the uncertainty of site destruction directly into the decision planning process, these models allow a conservation planner to take a less defensive and more strategic view of reserve selection that seeks to minimize species losses through the targeted acquisition of high-value/high-risk sites. We compare both of these methods to a more standard approach, which simply maximizes within reserve representation without regard for the varied level of threat faced by different sites and species. Results on a realistic dataset show that significant reductions in species losses can be achieved using either of these more intelligent modeling frameworks.

[1]  Jorgen B. Thomsen,et al.  Biodiversity Hotspots and Major Tropical Wilderness Areas: Approaches to Setting Conservation Priorities , 1998 .

[2]  R. Kevin Wood,et al.  Shortest‐path network interdiction , 2002, Networks.

[3]  Bo Jellesmark Thorsen,et al.  Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world , 2006 .

[4]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1997 .

[5]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Reserve selection in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa: coping with high compositional turnover , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[6]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  An Integer Optimization Approach to a Probabilistic Reserve Site Selection Problem , 2000, Oper. Res..

[7]  C. Revelle,et al.  Counterpart Models in Facility Location Science and Reserve Selection Science , 2002 .

[8]  Will R Turner,et al.  Adaptive Decision Rules for the Acquisition of Nature Reserves , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity collapse in neutral communities , 2004 .

[10]  Stephanie A. Snyder,et al.  A Scenario Optimization Model for Dynamic Reserve Site Selection , 2004 .

[11]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[12]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions , 2005 .

[13]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications , 1998 .

[14]  Risto K. Heikkinen,et al.  Complementarity and other key criteria in the conservation of herb-rich forests in Finland , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[15]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[16]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem , 1996 .

[17]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[18]  Thomas L. Magnanti,et al.  Applied Mathematical Programming , 1977 .

[19]  J. Liu,et al.  Ecological Degradation in Protected Areas: The Case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas , 2001, Science.

[20]  H. Possingham,et al.  The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation , 1993 .

[21]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[22]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  A Multicriteria Assessment of the Irreplaceability and Vulnerability of Sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem , 2002 .

[23]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[24]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Clustering and Compactness in Reserve Site Selection: An Extension of the Biodiversity Management Area Selection Model , 2003, Forest Science.

[25]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  Nature Reserve Site Selection to Maximize Expected Species Covered , 2002, Oper. Res..

[26]  M. Drechsler Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection , 2005 .

[27]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[28]  Denis White,et al.  INTEGRATING REPRESENTATION AND VULNERABILITY: TWO APPROACHES FOR PRIORITIZING AREAS FOR CONSERVATION , 2003 .

[29]  N. Myers Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests , 1988, The Environmentalist.

[30]  Volker Loeschcke,et al.  The optimization of biodiversity conservation , 1995 .

[31]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Biodiversity conservation: Reserve optimization or loss minimization? , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss , 2001 .

[33]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  The geography of vulnerability: incorporating species geography and human development patterns into conservation planning , 2000 .

[34]  J. Cruz,et al.  On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero-sum games , 1973 .