Current profile control for the development of consistent discharges in DIII-D

The number of tokamak discharges required to carry out meaningful experiments can be significantly reduced by current profile control in the early startup phase. The tokamak is a plasma-confinement device, suitable for confining plasma at the requisite high temperature necessary for initiating fusion. It is currently the most promising device for realizing sustained fusion power generation at a commercial grade level, though it is still in the experimental stage. Presently, difficult to achieve plasma conditions, such as the shape of the plasma current profile, are achieved in a trial and error fashion, which can be a lengthy, wasteful process. In this work we make use of model-based control techniques such as optimal feedforward control via nonlinear programming and linearized feedback control to obtain a target current profile at a specified time in low-confinement-mode (L-mode) discharges. The effectiveness of the controller is demonstrated experimentally.

[1]  A. G. Peeters,et al.  The bootstrap current and its consequences , 2000 .

[2]  O. Sauter,et al.  Neoclassical conductivity and bootstrap current formulas for general axisymmetric equilibria and arbitrary collisionality regime , 1999 .

[3]  Adrianus C. C. Sips.  Advanced scenarios for ITER operation , 2005 .

[4]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Nonlinear Physics-model-based Actuator Trajectory Optimization for Advanced Scenario Planning in the DIII-D Tokamak , 2014 .

[5]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Toroidal current profile control during low confinement mode plasma discharges in DIII-D via first-principles-driven model-based robust control synthesis , 2012 .

[6]  O. Sauter,et al.  Erratum: “Neoclassical conductivity and bootstrap current formulas for general axisymmetric equilibria and arbitrary collisionality regime” [Phys. Plasmas 6, 2834 (1999)] , 2002 .

[7]  E. J. Strait,et al.  DIII-D research in support of ITER , 2008 .

[8]  G. Hogeweij,et al.  Numerical optimization of actuator trajectories for ITER hybrid scenario profile evolution , 2014 .

[9]  R. J. Groebner,et al.  An emerging understanding of H-mode discharges in tokamaks , 1993 .

[10]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Development of burning plasma and advanced scenarios in the DIII-D tokamak , 2004 .

[11]  F. Felici,et al.  Real-time physics-model-based simulation of the current density profile in tokamak plasmas , 2011 .

[12]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Backstepping Control of the Toroidal Plasma Current Profile in the DIII-D Tokamak , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  E. Joffrin,et al.  A control-oriented model of the current profile in tokamak plasma , 2007 .

[14]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Towards model-based current profile control at DIII-D , 2007 .

[15]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Physics-based control-oriented modeling of the safety factor profile dynamics in high performance tokamak plasmas , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  F. Hinton,et al.  Theory of plasma transport in toroidal confinement systems , 1976 .

[17]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Progress toward fully noninductive, high beta conditions in DIII-D , 2005 .

[18]  Christophe Prieur,et al.  Lyapunov-based distributed control of the safety-factor profile in a tokamak plasma , 2013 .

[19]  Shunsuke Ide,et al.  Overview of JT-60U progress towards steady-state advanced tokamak , 2005 .

[20]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  First-principles-driven model-based current profile control for the DIII-D tokamak via LQI optimal control , 2013 .

[21]  S. H. Kim,et al.  A potentially robust plasma profile control approach for ITER using real-time estimation of linearized profile response models , 2012 .