Measurements of Colour Constancy by Using a Forced-Choice Matching Technique

Colour constancy is typically measured with techniques involving asymmetric matching by adjustment, in which the observer views two scenes under different illuminants and adjusts the colour of a reference patch in one to match a test patch in the other. This technique involves an unnatural task, requiring the observer to predict and adjust colour appearance under an illumination shift. Natural colour constancy is more a simple matter of determining whether a colour is the same as or different from that seen under different illumination conditions. There are also technical disadvantages to the method of matching by adjustment, particularly when used to measure colour constancy in complex scenes. Therefore, we have developed and tested a two-dimensional method of constant-stimuli, forced-choice matching paradigm for measuring colour constancy. Observers view test and reference scenes haploscopically and simultaneously, each eye maintaining separate adaptation throughout a session. On each trial, a pair of test and reference patches against multicoloured backgrounds are presented, the reference patch colours being selected from a two-dimensional grid of displayable colours around the point of perfect colour constancy. The observer's task is to respond “same” or “different”. Fitting a two-dimensional Gaussian to the percentage of “different” responses yields (1) the subjective colour-constancy point, (2) the discrimination ellipse centred on this point, and (3) a map of changes in sensitivity to chromatic differences induced by the illuminant shift. The subjective colour-constancy point measured in this way shows smaller deviations from perfect colour constancy—under conditions of monocular adaptation—than previously reported; discrimination ellipses are several times larger than standard MacAdam ellipses; and chromatic sensitivity is independent of the direction of the illuminant shift, for broad distributions of background colours.

[1]  D. L. Macadam Visual Sensitivities to Color Differences in Daylight , 1942 .

[2]  David L. MacAdam,et al.  The distribution of color matchings around a color center , 1945 .

[3]  M. Lucassen,et al.  Quantifying color constancy: Evidence for nonlinear processing of cone-specific contrast , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous color constancy. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Hh Bülthoff,et al.  Cues to the Color of the Illuminant , 1989 .

[6]  G. Plant,et al.  Insights into the different exploits of colour in the visual cortex , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous color constancy: paper with diverse Munsell values. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  I. G. Priest The Optical Society of America , 1962, Nature.

[9]  S Hecht,et al.  On the Binocular Fusion of Colors and Its Relation to Theories of Color Vision. , 1928, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Arthur A. Eastman,et al.  The Subjective Measurement of Color Shifts with and without Chromatic Adaptation , 1972 .

[11]  M. Webster,et al.  Colour constancy influenced by contrast adaptation , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Category effects in color memory , 1989 .

[13]  Carlos F. Borges Trichromatic approximation method for surface illumination , 1991 .

[14]  C. D. Weert,et al.  Naming versus matching in color constancy , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Testing colour-appearance models in cross-media image reproduction , 1994 .

[16]  M. Landy,et al.  A Bilinear Model of the Illuminant's Effect on Color Appearance , 1991 .

[17]  G. Buchsbaum,et al.  Quantitative studies of color constancy. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  S. McKee,et al.  Quantitative studies in retinex theory a comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the “color mondrian” experiments , 1976, Vision Research.

[19]  S. M. Newhall,et al.  Comparison of Successive with Simultaneous Color Matching , 1957 .

[20]  B A Wandell,et al.  Task-dependent color discrimination. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  D. L. Macadam,et al.  Visual sensitivities to combined chromaticity and luminance differences. , 1949, Journal of the Optical Society of America.