The Impact of Technical Copy Protection and Internet Services Usage on Software Piracy - An International Survey on Sequencer Software Piracy -

Software piracy has recently gained enormous attention, not only in the context of P2P-networks. As one countermeasure against software piracy, publishers have been implementing Digital Rights Management systems such as technical copy protection measures into their software products. This paper examines the impact of different technical copy protection measures and Internet services usage on software piracy using data from an internationally organized online survey. The results show that technical protection measures fail to achieve their protection goals, as none of the studied protection measures completely avoids piracy. A higher level of copy protection does not always make a legal software installation more likely. In contrast, a low level of protection does not necessarily lead to intense illegal copying. P2Pand Chat-networks compromise the security of technical copy protections as they provide access to cracked software copies, fostering software piracy. Based on our results, we discuss the impact of our findings on the publishers' anti-piracy strategy from an economic point of view and present possible security improvements for hardwareand software-based copy protections.

[1]  Attacks on and Countermeasures for USB Hardware Token Devices , 2000 .

[2]  Koen De Bosschere,et al.  Software piracy prevention through diversity , 2004, DRM '04.

[3]  D. McFadden.  MEASUREMENT OF URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND , 1974 .

[4]  J. S. Cramer,et al.  Predicitive performance of the binary logit model in unbalanced samples , 1999 .

[5]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Software Piracy: Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion , 1995 .

[6]  Premkumar T. Devanbu,et al.  Software engineering for security: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[7]  David G Steel,et al.  Which Countries Protect Intellectual Property? The Case of Software Piracy , 2000 .

[8]  Ram D. Gopal,et al.  Preventive and Deterrent Controls for Software Piracy , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Oz Shy,et al.  A strategic approach to software protection , 1999 .

[10]  Ranjan B. Kini,et al.  Shaping of Moral Intensity Regarding Software Piracy: A Comparison Between Thailand and U.S. Students , 2004 .

[11]  Diane Lending,et al.  Research in progress: the effects of ethical climate on attitudes and behaviors toward software piracy , 2001, SIGCPR '01.

[12]  S. Hinduja.  Trends and patterns among online software pirates , 2003, Ethics and Information Technology.

[13]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Response Effects in the Electronic Survey , 1986 .

[14]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[15]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Software Piracy in the Workplace: A Model and Empirical Test , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Hsing K. Cheng,et al.  To Purchase or to Pirate Software: An Empirical Study , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  D. Bernhardt,et al.  Pirated for Profit , 1998 .

[18]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[19]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies , 1991 .

[20]  Ram D. Gopal,et al.  Global software piracy: you can't get blood out of a turnip , 2000, CACM.

[21]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  The Effect of Piracy on the Market Penetration of Subscription Software , 2004 .

[22]  B. Husted.  The Impact of National Culture on Software Piracy , 2000 .

[23]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  A Cross-Country Study of Electronic Business Adoption Using the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework , 2002, ICIS.

[24]  Sameer Hinduja,et al.  Correlates of Internet Software Piracy , 2001 .

[25]  Eric P. Chiang,et al.  Software copyright infringement among college students , 2002 .