Reflexive and Preparatory Selection and Suppression of Salient Information in the Right and Left Posterior Parietal Cortex

Attentional cues can trigger activity in the parietal cortex in anticipation of visual displays, and this activity may, in turn, induce changes in other areas of the visual cortex, hence, implementing attentional selection. In a recent TMS study [Mevorach, C., Humphreys, G. W., & Shalev, L. Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 740–742, 2006b], it was shown that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) can utilize the relative saliency (a nonspatial property) of a target and a distractor to bias visual selection. Furthermore, selection was lateralized so that the right PPC is engaged when salient information must be selected and the left PPC when the salient information must be ignored. However, it is not clear how the PPC implements these complementary forms of selection. Here we used on-line triple-pulse TMS over the right or left PPC prior to or after the onset of global/local displays. When delivered after the onset of the display, TMS to the right PPC disrupted the selection of the more salient aspect of the hierarchical letter. In contrast, left PPC TMS delivered prior to the onset of the stimulus disrupted responses to the lower saliency stimulus. These findings suggest that selection and suppression of saliency, rather than being “two sides of the same coin,” are fundamentally different processes. Selection of saliency seems to operate reflexively, whereas suppression of saliency relies on a preparatory phase that “sets up” the system in order to effectively ignore saliency.

[1]  Eirini Mavritsaki,et al.  The neural mechanisms of visual selection: the view from neuropsychology , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Effects of saliency, not global dominance, in patients with left parietal damage , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Jacqueline Gottlieb,et al.  LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Dissociable Contributions of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices to Response Selection , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Ferber,et al.  Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe , 2001, Nature.

[13]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial attention in early vision. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[14]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Areas Involved in Encoding and Applying Directional Expectations to Moving Objects , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[23]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  X. Hu,et al.  4 T-fMRI study of nonspatial shifting of selective attention: cerebellar and parietal contributions. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[26]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[30]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  G R Grice,et al.  Forest before trees? It depends where you look , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Orienting of Attention Orienting of Attention* , 2022 .

[34]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). , 2003, Psychological review.

[37]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Control of object-based attention in human cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  A. Cowey,et al.  Citation for Published Item: Use Policy Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Neuropsychologia Manuscript Draft Time Course of the Involvement of the Ventral and Dorsal Visual Processing Streams in a Visuospatial Task , 2022 .