Functional dependence in the human brain: A graph theoretical analysis

In this paper, we propose a graph-theoretical approach to reveal patterns of functional dependencies between different scalp regions. We start by computing pairwise measures of dependence from dense-array scalp electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. The obtained dependence matrices are then averaged over trials and further statistically processed to provide more reliability. Graph structure information is subsequently extracted using several graph theoretical measures. Simple measures of node degree and clustering strength are shown to be useful to describe the global properties of the analyzed networks. More sophisticated measures, such as betweenness centrality and subgraph centrality tend to provide additional insight into the network structure, and therefore robustly discriminate two cognitive states. We further examine the connected components of the graph to identify the dependent functional regions. The approach supports dynamicity in that all suggested computations can be easily extended to different points in time, thus enabling to monitor dependence evolution and variability with time.

[1]  J. A. Rodríguez-Velázquez,et al.  Subgraph centrality in complex networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  J. Gore,et al.  Mutual information analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Graphical models in R , 1996 .

[5]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Quantifying Cognitive State From EEG Using Dependence Measures , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Applying Social Network Analysis Techniques to Community-Driven Libre Software Projects , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Web Eng..

[7]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[8]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Robust EEG preprocessing for dependence-based condition discrimination , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Seung-Hyun Jin,et al.  EEG in schizophrenic patients: mutual information analysis , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Cornelis J Stam,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain , 2007, Nonlinear biomedical physics.

[11]  Kaspar Anton Schindler,et al.  Assessing seizure dynamics by analysing the correlation structure of multichannel intracranial EEG. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[13]  K. Goh,et al.  Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  J. Anthonisse The rush in a directed graph , 1971 .

[15]  Austin J. Brockmeier,et al.  An Association Framework to Analyze Dependence Structure in Time Series , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[18]  W. Hesse,et al.  The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  M. Corsi-Cabrera,et al.  EEG coherence or EEG correlation? , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  M. Barthelemy Betweenness centrality in large complex networks , 2003, cond-mat/0309436.