Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patients.

Over a 34.5-month period, all admissions to 5 university hospital coronary care units were screened for eligibility for the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS), an ongoing study of the effects of hyaluronidase, propranolol and placebo on myocardial infarct (MI) size. Of 3,697 patients with greater than or equal to 30 minutes of discomfort that was thought to reflect myocardial ischemia who were assessed for the presence or absence of certain electrocardiographic abnormalities at the time of hospital admission, the electrocardiogram was considered predictive of acute MI if greater than or equal to 1 of the following abnormalities was present: new or presumably new Q waves (greater than or equal to 30 ms wide and 0.20 mV deep) in at least 2 of the 3 diaphragmatic leads (II, III, aVF), or in at least 2 of the 6 precordial leads (V1 to V6), or in I and aVL; new or presumably new ST-segment elevation or depression of greater than or equal to 0.10 mV in 1 of the same lead combinations; or complete left bundle branch block. In the screened population, the diagnostic sensitivity of the electrocardiographic criteria was 81%, whereas the overall infarct rate in the total population screened was 49%. The diagnostic specificity of these entry criteria was 69% and the predictive value 72%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  D. Berman,et al.  Intracoronary thrombolysis in evolving myocardial infarction. , 1981, American heart journal.

[2]  M. Scheinman,et al.  Nondiagnostic electrocardiogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clinical and anatomic correlations. , 1973, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  The use of logistic regression for modelling risk factors: with application to non-melanoma skin cancer. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  B. Sobel,et al.  Serum Enzyme Determinations in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Myocardial Infarction , 1972, Circulation.

[5]  P. Libby,et al.  Favorable effects of hyaluronidase on electrocardiographic evidence of necrosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Pyke,et al.  Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies , 1979 .

[7]  Jeffrey A. Stem,et al.  A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Willerson,et al.  Radioimmunoassay of serum creatine kinase B isoenzyme in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Correlation with technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigraphy. , 1980, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  T. Peter,et al.  Reduction of Enzyme Levels by Propranolol After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1978, Circulation.

[10]  J. Cornfield,et al.  A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham. , 1967, Journal of chronic diseases.

[11]  W. M. Smith,et al.  PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF PROPRANOLOL IN THREATENED MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1978, The Lancet.

[12]  B. Modan,et al.  Evaluation of electrocardiogram in emergency room as a decision-making tool. , 1977, Chest.

[13]  E. Massie,et al.  Clinical vectorcardiography and electrocardiography , 1960 .

[14]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Enzymatic estimation of myocardial infarct size when early creatine kinase values are not available. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  L. Horan,et al.  The Significance of Diagnostic Q Waves in the Presence of Bundle Branch Block , 1970 .

[16]  Glatt Mm,et al.  Letter: Scientific medicine. , 1974 .