The Determinants and Consequences of Subsidiary Initiative in Multinational Corporations

This paper examines corporate entrepreneurship in multinational corporations through a detailed study of initiatives taken by foreign subsidiaries. We develop a theoretical model in which two levels of organizational context (corporate and subsidiary) promote or suppress subsidiary initiative, and initiative in turn has a feedback effect on both subsidiary and corporate context. Using a multi-method study (229 questionnaire returns plus 5 in-depth case studies), the key findings are as follows: Subsidiary initiative is promoted by a high level of distinctive subsidiary capabilities, and is suppressed by a high level of decision centralization, a low level of subsidiary credibility, and a low level of corporate-subsidiary communication. Over time, we find evidence that subsidiary initiative leads to an enhancement of credibility (vis-à-vis the head office), head office openness, corporate-subsidiary communication, and distinctive capabilities.

[1]  Roderick E. White,et al.  The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters , 1999 .

[2]  J. Birkinshaw.  Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations : The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives , 1997 .

[3]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[4]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[5]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[6]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs , 1994 .

[7]  Michael Hay,et al.  Confronting the challenges of corporate entrepreneurship: Guidelines for venture managers , 1994 .

[8]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension , 1993 .

[9]  Jeffrey S. Hornsby,et al.  An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process , 1993 .

[10]  A. Morrison,et al.  Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates , 1992 .

[11]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[12]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[13]  H. Howard,et al.  Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship || A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management , 1990 .

[14]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[15]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[16]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1988 .

[17]  Charles R. Schwenk.  THE COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING , 1988 .

[18]  Hollister B. Sykes.  The anatomy of a corporate venturing program: Factors influencing success , 1986 .

[19]  J. D. Couger.  E pluribus computum , 1986 .

[20]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[21]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[22]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy , 1983 .

[23]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[24]  A. Pettigrew.  On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[25]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[26]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  THE ENTREPRENEURIAL PERSONALITY: A PERSON AT THE CROSSROADS , 1977 .