Structural Monitoring of Underground Structures in Multi-Layer Media by Dynamic Methods

The actual problem of structural monitoring and modeling of dynamic response from buried building is considered in the framework of arbitrary dynamic load. The results can be used for designing underground transport constructions, crossings, buried reservoirs and foundations. In existing methods, the system of sensors that register the response to a dynamic action does not allow for effective interpretation of the signal without understanding the dynamic features and resonance phenomena. The analytical and numerical solution of the problem of the dynamics of a buried object in a layered medium is considered. A multilayer half-space is a set of rigidly interconnected layers characterized by elastic properties. At a distance, an arbitrary dynamic load acts on the half-space, which causes oscillations in the embedded structure, and the sensor system registers the response. The problem of assessing the dynamic stress-strain state (DSSS) is solved using Fourier transforms with the principle of limiting absorption. As an example, the behavior of an embedded massive structure of an underground pedestrian crossing under the influence of a dynamic surface source on a multilayer medium is considered, as well as instrumental support of the sensor system. The solution in the form of stress, strain and displacement fields is obtained and compared with the experimental data. The frequency-dependent characteristics of the system are determined and the possibility of determining the DSSS by a shock pulse is shown.

[1]  C. Kasbergen,et al.  Dynamic analysis of layered systems under a moving harmonic rectangular load based on the spectral element method , 2019 .

[2]  Chao He,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analytical Model for Coupled Track-Tunnel-Soil System in a Multilayered Half-Space , 2020 .

[3]  G. Jiang,et al.  Experimental Study of Bridge Foundation Reinforced with Front and Back Rows of Anti-Slide Piles on Gravel Soil Slope under El Centro Waves , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[4]  R. Turusov,et al.  Layered composite and contact layer. Normal separation and transversal strength , 2018 .

[5]  Attilio De Martino,et al.  Earthquake Response of Cold-Formed Steel-Based Building Systems: An Overview of the Current State of the Art , 2019 .

[6]  J. Qian,et al.  Dynamic responses of layered poroelastic ground under moving traffic loads considering effects of pavement roughness , 2020 .

[7]  Shengwen Qi,et al.  Numerical Study on Dynamic Response of a Horizontal Layered-Structure Rock Slope under a Normally Incident Sv Wave , 2017 .

[8]  A. Beskopylny,et al.  Complex method of defects diagnostics in underground structures , 2018 .

[9]  3D dynamic responses of a 2D hill in a layered half-space subjected to obliquely incident plane P-, SV- and SH-waves , 2019, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements.

[10]  A A Lyapin On the layered structures material properties definition , 2019 .

[11]  A. Beskopylny,et al.  Model of heterogeneous reinforced fiber foam concrete in bending , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[12]  E. Şadoğlu,et al.  Dynamic properties of sand-bitumen mixtures as a geotechnical seismic isolation material , 2020 .

[13]  Hubert Anysz,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Classification of Steel Grades Based on Non-Destructive Tests , 2020, Materials.

[14]  Shishu Zhang,et al.  An Analytical Solution for Block Toppling Failure of Rock Slopes during an Earthquake , 2017 .

[15]  Francesco Bertocci,et al.  Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM): A Robust Method for Defect Detection during the Manufacturing Process of Ultrasound Probes for Medical Imaging , 2019, Sensors.

[16]  Antonio Mannella,et al.  Seismic Response of a Structure Equipped with an External Viscous Damping System , 2020 .

[17]  V. N. Andreev,et al.  Layered structures mechanical properties assessment by dynamic tests , 2017 .

[18]  Jens Prager,et al.  Analysis of Guided Wave Propagation in a Multi-Layered Structure in View of Structural Health Monitoring , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[19]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  Development of a High-Sensitivity Wireless Accelerometer for Structural Health Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[20]  Xiao-Wei Ye,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Stress Signals from Bridge Monitoring by FBG System , 2018, Sensors.

[21]  Jianwen Liang,et al.  3D dynamic soil-structure interaction in layered, fluid-saturated, poroelastic half-space , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[22]  A. Beskopylny,et al.  Assessment of the Fatigue Durability of the Rolling Contact , 2017 .

[23]  Jing Liu,et al.  A dynamic modelling method of a rotor-roller bearing-housing system with a localized fault including the additional excitation zone , 2020 .

[24]  Stefano Sorace,et al.  Advanced Seismic Retrofit of a Mixed R/C-Steel Structure , 2019 .

[25]  Tong Liu,et al.  Seismic Response of Aeolian Sand High Embankment Slopes in Shaking Table Tests , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[26]  Z. Ai,et al.  Dynamic analysis of a transversely isotropic multilayered half-plane subjected to a moving load , 2016 .

[27]  Mehrisadat Makki Alamdari,et al.  A Tensor-Based Structural Damage Identification and Severity Assessment , 2018, Sensors.

[28]  R. Turusov,et al.  Layered composite and contact layer. Effective modulus of elasticity , 2019, E3S Web of Conferences.

[29]  A. Lyapin,et al.  Vibration-Based Damage Detection Techniques for Health Monitoring of Construction of a Multi-Storey Building , 2018, Materials Science Forum.

[30]  Danial Jahed Armaghani,et al.  Evaluating Slope Deformation of Earth Dams Due to Earthquake Shaking Using MARS and GMDH Techniques , 2020, Applied Sciences.