A societal risk study for transportation of class-3 hazmats – A case of Indian state highways

Abstract United Nations Class-3 hazardous materials (hazmats) are basically liquid products and transported in road tankers under ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure. They are mostly flammables and some of them are toxic (e.g. benzene) as well. The spillages due to collision related incidents involving the road tankers, carrying such hazmats through highways, pose not only flammability hazards due to pool fire, flash fire and vapor cloud explosion (VCE), but create substantial toxic hazards also. The paper presents the risk-based study of route evaluation of two state highways and one urban city road in western India on account of transportation of class-3 hazmats, namely benzene, toluene, p-xylene, methanol, cyclohexane and acetone. A comparative evaluation of study routes was undertaken based on their societal risks presented in terms of F–N curves and assessed against HSE, UK as well as VROM, The Netherlands risk acceptance criteria. Societal risks contribution of cyclohexane to the overall flammability risk mainly VCE is found to be the highest followed by acetone and benzene compared to other study hazmats. This is due to highly explosive nature of cyclohexane resulting into vapor cloud explosion. While acetone and methanol pool fires are likely to cause larger area of damage compared to others, benzene supersedes others as far as toxicity risk is concerned and larger evacuation area is encountered, as it poses greater Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) distance than others. Besides, study of initial isolation distance following an accident in case of benzene tanker found that benzene spillage requires larger initial isolation distance than others and so are the day and night protective action zone distances.

[1]  Eugene R. Russell,et al.  PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPING TRUCK ACCIDENT AND RELEASE RATES FOR HAZMAT ROUTING , 1991 .

[2]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .

[3]  Dinesh Mohan,et al.  Road Accidents in India , 2009 .

[4]  Uday Kumar Chakrabarti,et al.  Route evaluation for hazmat transportation based on total risk - A case of Indian State Highways , 2011 .

[5]  V Verter,et al.  A GIS-based framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment. , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Dan Vamanu,et al.  Comprehensive risk assessment for rail transportation of dangerous goods: a validated platform for decision support , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Fedel Frank Saccomanno,et al.  Hazmat Transport Risks: Societal and Individual Perspectives , 1993 .

[8]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Historical analysis of accidents in chemical plants and in the transportation of hazardous materials , 1995 .

[9]  G. Madhu,et al.  Individual and societal risk analysis and mapping of human vulnerability to chemical accidents in the vicinity of an industrial area , 2010 .

[10]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Dangerous good transportation by road: from risk analysis to emergency planning , 2005 .

[11]  Reginald B. H. Tan,et al.  Risk analysis for the road transportation of hazardous chemicals in Singapore- a methodology , 1995 .

[12]  Konstantinos G. Zografos,et al.  A decision support system for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions , 2008 .

[13]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Hazardous materials transportation , 2011 .