Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production

Abstract Current accounts of spoken production debate the extent to which speakers plan ahead. Here, we investigated whether the scope of phonological planning is influenced by changes in time pressure constraints. The first experiment used a picture–word interference task and showed that picture naming latencies were shorter when word distractors shared the final segments with the picture name. Experiment 2 used the same paradigm but with colored pictures to elicit determiner + adjective + noun phrases. Latencies were shorter when the distractor overlapped phonologically with the picture name. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that in colored picture naming without distractors, latencies were shorter when the object noun began with the same phoneme as the color adjective. Crucially, in all experiments introduction of a response deadline accelerated latencies, but did not alter the relative magnitude of the priming effects. In sum, pressure to provide a swift response does not reduce the scope of phonological planning.

[1]  H Schriefers,et al.  Priming Effects from Phonologically Related Distractors in Picture—Word Interference , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Utterance format affects phonological priming in the picture-word task: implications for models of phonological encoding in speech production. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It's in the links. , 1991 .

[4]  P A Starreveld,et al.  Word substitution errors in a speeded picture-word task. , 1999, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  Albert Costa,et al.  Planning at the Phonological Level during Sentence Production , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[7]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production , 1981 .

[8]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .

[9]  Albert Costa,et al.  Hedging one's bets too much? A reply to Levelt (2002) , 2002 .

[10]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[11]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access , 2002 .

[12]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[13]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Planning units and syntax in sentence production , 1978, Cognition.

[14]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics , 1981 .

[15]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production , 2003 .

[16]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study. , 1998 .

[17]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[18]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[19]  D. Plaut,et al.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  V. Fromkin Speech errors as linguistic evidence , 1976 .

[21]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. , 1975 .

[23]  Michael I. Jordan Motor Learning and the Degrees of Freedom Problem , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[24]  M. Damian Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[26]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999 .

[27]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[28]  H. Schriefers Phonological Facilitation in the Production of Two-word Utterances , 1999 .

[29]  Aditi Lahiri,et al.  The minimal unit of phonological encoding: prosodic or lexical word , 2002, Cognition.

[30]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  D. Balota,et al.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  A. Meyer Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[34]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion , 2003 .

[36]  F. Ferreira Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances , 1991 .

[37]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[38]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  On Naming a Giraffe a Zebra: Picture Naming Errors Across Different Object Categories , 1993 .

[39]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  Input, Decision, and Response Factors in Picture-Word Interference , 1981 .

[40]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Picture naming and word frequency: Comments on Alario, Costa and Caramazza, Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 299-319 , 2002 .

[41]  K Rayner,et al.  Stages of processing in word identification. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  A Caramazza,et al.  The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Parallelism in the Production of Noun Phrases: Experiments and Reaction Time Models. , 1999 .

[44]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[46]  K. Rayner,et al.  Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[48]  Michael P. Sullivan,et al.  The Nature of Phonological Encoding During Spoken Word Retrieval , 1999 .

[49]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Aspects of language production , 2000 .

[50]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[51]  G. Dell,et al.  Inhibition in interactive activation models of linguistic selection and sequencing. , 1994 .