Characterization of conditional state-engineering quantum processes by coherent state quantum process tomography

Conditional quantum optical processes enable a wide range of technologies from generation of highly non-classical states to implementation of quantum logic operations. The process fidelity that can be achieved in a realistic implementation depends on a number of system parameters. Here we experimentally examine Fock state filtration, a canonical example of a broad class of conditional quantum operations acting on a single optical field mode. This operation is based upon interference of the mode to be manipulated with an auxiliary single-photon state at a beam splitter, resulting in the entanglement of the two output modes. A conditional projective measurement onto a single photon state at one output mode heralds the success of the process. This operation, which implements a measurement-induced nonlinearity, is capable of suppressing particular photon-number probability amplitudes of an arbitrary quantum state. We employ coherent-state process tomography to determine the precise operation realized in our experiment, which is mathematically represented by a process tensor. To identify the key sources of experimental imperfection, we develop a realistic model of the process and identify three main contributions that significantly hamper its efficacy. The experimentally reconstructed process tensor is compared with the model, yielding a fidelity better than 0.95. This enables us to identify three key challenges to overcome in realizing a filter with optimal performance?namely the single-photon nature of the auxiliary state, high mode overlap of the optical fields involved, and the need for photon-number-resolving detection when heralding. The results show that the filter does indeed exhibit a non-linear response as a function of input photon number and preserves the phase relation between Fock layers of the output state, providing promise for future applications.

[1]  K. Sanaka Linear optical extraction of photon-number Fock states from coherent states , 2005 .

[2]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum States. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[3]  Marco Barbieri,et al.  Multiphoton state engineering by heralded interference between single photons and coherent states , 2012, 1205.0497.

[4]  Marco G. Genoni,et al.  Quantifying non-Gaussianity for quantum information , 2010, 1008.4243.

[5]  Jan-AAke Larsson,et al.  Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism , 2014, 1407.0363.

[6]  B. Baseia,et al.  Controlled hole burning in the photon-number distribution of field states in a cavity , 2001 .

[7]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  Experimental generation of multi-photon Fock states. , 2012, Optics express.

[8]  A. I. Lvovsky,et al.  Quantum-optical state engineering up to the two-photon level , 2009, 0908.4113.

[9]  P. L. Knight,et al.  Entanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a prerequisite for entanglement , 2002 .

[10]  M. Barbieri,et al.  Experimental realization of a nondeterministic optical noiseless amplifier , 2011 .

[11]  J. Fiurášek,et al.  A high-fidelity noiseless amplifier for quantum light states , 2010, 1004.3399.

[12]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Fiber-assisted detection with photon number resolution. , 2003, Optics letters.

[13]  Masahide Sasaki,et al.  Entanglement distillation from Gaussian input states , 2010 .

[14]  J. Rarity,et al.  Photonic quantum technologies , 2009, 1003.3928.

[15]  E. Knill,et al.  A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[16]  Makoto Takeuchi,et al.  Photon subtraction from traveling fields - recent experimental demonstrations , 2011, 1104.4189.

[17]  L. Knoll,et al.  GENERATION OF ARBITRARY QUANTUM STATES OF TRAVELING FIELDS , 1999 .

[18]  A I Lvovsky,et al.  Quantum-optical catalysis: generating nonclassical states of light by means of linear optics. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[19]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View , 2004, quant-ph/0404156.

[20]  G. Vallone,et al.  Experimental quantum process tomography of non-trace-preserving maps , 2010, 1008.5334.

[21]  James C. Gates,et al.  High quantum efficiency photon-number-resolving detector for photonic on-chip information processing , 2013, CLEO: 2013.

[22]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Continuous‐variable quantum information processing , 2010, 1008.3468.

[23]  Philippe Grangier,et al.  Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger cats’ from photon number states , 2007, Nature.

[24]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[25]  V. Bagnato,et al.  Hole burning in Fock space , 1998 .

[26]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Quantum state preparation and conditional coherence. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[27]  T. Anhut,et al.  Generating Schrödinger-cat-like states by means of conditional measurements on a beam splitter , 1997 .

[28]  A. Lvovsky,et al.  Distillation of the two-mode squeezed state. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[29]  G. D’Ariano,et al.  Optical Fock-state synthesizer , 2000, quant-ph/0001065.

[30]  M. Cooper,et al.  High-stability time-domain balanced homodyne detector for ultrafast optical pulse applications , 2011, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[31]  Masato Koashi,et al.  Quantum-scissors device for optical state truncation: A proposal for practical realization , 2001 .

[32]  I. Walmsley,et al.  Turning classical states quantum with linear optics and photon counting , 2012, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[33]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Filtering out photonic Fock states. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[34]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[35]  Aamir Anis,et al.  Maximum-likelihood coherent-state quantum process tomography , 2012, 1204.5936.

[36]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum Information with Continuous Variables , 2004, quant-ph/0410100.

[37]  M. S. Kim,et al.  Recent developments in photon-level operations on travelling light fields , 2008, 0807.4708.

[38]  Peter C Humphreys,et al.  On-chip low loss heralded source of pure single photons. , 2013, Optics express.

[39]  K. Resch Spatiotemporal few-photon optical nonlinearities through linear optics and measurement , 2004 .

[40]  B. Sanders,et al.  Quantum process tomography with coherent states , 2010, 1009.3307.

[41]  S. Barnett,et al.  OPTICAL STATE TRUNCATION BY PROJECTION SYNTHESIS , 1998 .

[42]  Julien Laurat,et al.  Generating Optical Schrödinger Kittens for Quantum Information Processing , 2006, Science.

[43]  A I Lvovsky,et al.  Experimental characterization of bosonic creation and annihilation operators. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[44]  Hong,et al.  Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[45]  R. Hadfield Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications , 2009 .

[46]  Yuta Takahashi,et al.  Non-Gaussian operation based on photon subtraction using a photon-number-resolving detector at a telecommunications wavelength , 2010 .

[47]  P. Grangier,et al.  Multimode model for projective photon-counting measurements , 2009 .

[48]  Barry C Sanders,et al.  Complete Characterization of Quantum-Optical Processes , 2008, Science.

[49]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Detecting quantum light , 2007 .

[50]  Marco Barbieri,et al.  Nondeterministic noiseless amplification of optical signals: a review of recent experiments , 2011 .

[51]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Entanglement generation by Fock-state filtration. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[52]  A. I. Lvovsky,et al.  Synthesis and tomographic characterization of the displaced Fock state of light , 2002 .

[53]  D. Welsch,et al.  Quantum state engineering using conditional measurement on a beam splitter , 1998, quant-ph/9803077.

[54]  E. Knill,et al.  Diluted maximum-likelihood algorithm for quantum tomography , 2006, quant-ph/0611244.