Ferrous Polycrystalline Shape-Memory Alloy Showing Huge Superelasticity

Ferrous Shape Memory Alloy So-called shape memory alloys “remember” the shape they are processed into, and can return to that shape after being deformed by heat. A limitation for most metal-based shape memory alloys is the extent to which they can be deformed elastically. Tanaka et al. (p. 1488; see the Perspective by Ma and Karaman) demonstrate an iron-based alloy that shows much higher levels of superelastic strain, surpassing the performance of nickel-titanium alloys. In addition to high superelastic strain, this ferrous shape memory alloy has much higher strength than NiTi and copper-based shape memory alloys and, consequently, a high-energy absorption capability. These properties may allow shape memory alloys to be exploited as strain sensors or energy dampers. A shape-memory alloy has been prepared with high mechanical energy absorption capability and reversible magnetization change. Shape-memory alloys, such as Ni-Ti and Cu-Zn-Al, show a large reversible strain of more than several percent due to superelasticity. In particular, the Ni-Ti–based alloy, which exhibits some ductility and excellent superelastic strain, is the only superelastic material available for practical applications at present. We herein describe a ferrous polycrystalline, high-strength, shape-memory alloy exhibiting a superelastic strain of more than 13%, with a tensile strength above 1 gigapascal, which is almost twice the maximum superelastic strain obtained in the Ni-Ti alloys. Furthermore, this ferrous alloy has a very large damping capacity and exhibits a large reversible change in magnetization during loading and unloading. This ferrous shape-memory alloy has great potential as a high-damping and sensor material.

[1]  H. Maier,et al.  Pseudoelasticity and Cyclic Stability in Co49Ni21Ga30 Shape-Memory Alloy Single Crystals at Ambient Temperature , 2008 .

[2]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Structural Engineering with NiTi . II: Mechanical Behavior and Scaling , 2007 .

[3]  Norio Shinya,et al.  Low-cost high-quality Fe-based shape memory alloys suitable for pipe joints , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Special metals for seismic retrofitting of steel buildings , 2003 .

[5]  K. Ishida,et al.  Enhancement of superelasticity in Cu-Al-Mn-Ni shape-memory alloys by texture control , 2002 .

[6]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys , 2002 .

[7]  S. Kajiwara,et al.  Characteristic features of shape memory effect and related transformation behavior in Fe-based alloys , 1999 .

[8]  S. Kajiwara,et al.  Shape memory effect and related transformation behavior in FeNiC alloys , 1990 .

[9]  K. Arai,et al.  Grain boundaries in rapidly solidified and annealed Fe-6.5 mass% Si polycrystalline ribbons with high ductility , 1989 .

[10]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Magnetoelastic martensitic transformation in an ausaged FeNiCoTi alloy , 1985 .

[11]  K. Kobayashi,et al.  Thermoelastic martensite in an ausaged FeNiTiCo alloy , 1984 .

[12]  A. Sato,et al.  Shape memory effect in γ⇄ϵ transformation in Fe-30Mn-1Si alloy single crystals , 1982 .

[13]  T. Sohmura,et al.  Thermoelastic FCC-FCT martensitic transformation in FePd alloy , 1980 .

[14]  C. M. Wayman,et al.  The effect of austenite ordering on the martensite transformation in Fe-Pt alloys near the composition Fe3Pt: I. Morphology and transformation characteristics , 1973 .

[15]  E. Hornbogen,et al.  Martensitische Umwandlung von Mischkristallen mit kohärenten Teilchen , 1967 .