Incremental Change, Transition or Transformation? Optimising Change Pathways for Climate Adaptation in Spatial Planning

In order to incorporate climate adaptation in spatial planning change is required, because climate change impacts the way we live. This implies that spatial planning, as the arranger of the spatial organisation and layout needs to be able to support this change. Current spatial planning is not yet well equipped to play this role. In this research article three possible routes to navigate change are explored. Incremental change is seen as a slow process, which modifies the landscape only slightly. Transition is seen as a fluent change towards a new future, which is an improved version of the existing; and transformation is seen as a change towards a future that is fundamentally different from the existing. The three pathways are compared and it is concluded that transformational change offers the best perspective in dealing with uncertain, unexpected and unprecedented futures, such as developing in times of climate change. Therefore, transformation is theoretically further elaborated and it is found that a transformational change to a new system already starts at a time when the existing system still fully operates. The change to a new system (called B in this article) therefore already started and the predecessors of B already existed. These ‘B-minuses’ of the new system can be found through network analysis, where the most intense and connective nodes are the most likely ‘B-minuses’. Alternatively B-minuses can be created through locating the areas where key-nodes and existing infrastructure can be related to existing urban functions. As illustrated in the case-study design, these principles are able to guide the design of a climate proof landscape.

[1]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[2]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[3]  R. Lazarus.  Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future , 2008 .

[4]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  A Model of Large-Scale proteome Evolution , 2002, Adv. Complex Syst..

[5]  W. Steffen,et al.  Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure , 2005 .

[6]  Paul Arthur Berkman,et al.  Governance and Environmental Change in the Arctic Ocean , 2009, Science.

[7]  René Kemp,et al.  Transities & transitiemanagement: De casus van een emissiearme energievoorziening , 2000 .

[8]  J. Carter,et al.  Spatial Planning for Climate Change Adaptation , 2011 .

[9]  Carlota Perez,et al.  Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital , 2003 .

[10]  P. Crutzen,et al.  The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature , 2007, Ambio.

[11]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[12]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  S. Broersma,et al.  Duurzame energiebeelden voor de Veenkoloniën op basis van energiepotentiekartering en netwerkanalyses , 2011 .

[14]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[15]  Op zoek naar synergie : omgaan met onoplosbare problemen , 2007 .

[16]  Kees van der Heijden,et al.  Business Planning for Turbulent Times: New Methods for Applying Scenarios , 2010 .

[17]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches , 2001 .

[18]  George T. L. Land.  Grow or Die: The Principle of Transformation. , 1973 .

[19]  B. Ghodeswar,et al.  Building brand identity in competitive markets: a conceptual model , 2008 .

[20]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Early-warning signals for critical transitions , 2009, Nature.

[21]  Eric S. Kasischke,et al.  Resilience of Alaska's Boreal Forest to Climatic Change , 2010 .

[22]  K. Arrow,et al.  Looming Global-Scale Failures and Missing Institutions , 2009, Science.

[23]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[24]  R. Garud,et al.  Path dependence and creation , 2003 .

[25]  George T. L. Land,et al.  Grow or Die: The Unifying Principle of Transformation , 1973 .

[26]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Transitions, transformations and reproduction : dynamics in socio-technical systems , 2006 .

[27]  G. B. A. Barab'asi.  Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks , 2000, cond-mat/0011029.

[28]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability , 2010 .

[29]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[30]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[31]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[32]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[33]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[34]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[35]  F. Geels.  Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[36]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[37]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .