Positive Effects of Disruptive Advertising on Consumer Preferences

Abstract Advertisers want to get consumers to love the advertised products, but they often try to do this by annoying them with unwelcome and disruptive advertising. This creates a possible contradiction between the negative feelings elicited by the advertising and the positive feelings the consumers are supposed to develop towards the advertised products. One may assume that the negative feelings towards annoying advertising are transferred to the advertised brands. This assumption was tested in a series of five experiments. Participants were disrupted by annoying pop-up ads while playing a popular computer game. In a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) test, participants were required to choose between advertised and new brands. The advertised brands were preferred over the new brands, even though the ads were perceived as annoying. The positive effects of disruptive advertising can be attributed to the enhanced fluency of advertised brands. These findings demonstrate that disruptive advertising can be effective in increasing brand preferences, which may help to explain the widespread use of this type of advertising in practice. However, before recommending the use of disruptive advertising, it should be taken into consideration that it may also have undesirable side effects such as increasing advertising avoidance.

[1]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[2]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Hairong Li,et al.  Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads , 2002 .

[4]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[5]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[6]  B. Newell,et al.  Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[8]  Grant Mccracken Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[9]  Dildar Hussain,et al.  Online Video Advertisement Avoidance: Can Interactivity Help? , 2013 .

[10]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[12]  M. Watkins,et al.  Recognition memory and the mere exposure effect. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects , 2003 .

[14]  Xiang Fang,et al.  An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect , 2007 .

[15]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[16]  T. Stafford,et al.  Memory Enhances the Mere Exposure Effect , 2012 .

[17]  M. Perugini,et al.  Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[19]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  Missing the Mark , 2011 .

[20]  Chris Janiszewski Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects , 1993 .

[21]  C. Yoo Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set , 2008 .

[22]  Angela Y. Lee The Mere Exposure Effect: An Uncertainty Reduction Explanation Revisited , 2001 .

[23]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. , 1997 .

[24]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE AVOID ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET? , 2004 .

[25]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Do Interruptions Pay off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay , 2011, ArXiv.

[26]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Effects of Ad Affect on Advertising Effectiveness , 1983 .

[27]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[28]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Interactive Facial Feature Localization , 2012, ECCV.