Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit Lesion Only in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Substudy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Køber | T. Engstrøm | L. Holmvang | H. Kelbæk | S. Helqvist | P. Clemmensen | O. De Backer | D. Høfsten | E. Jørgensen | F. Pedersen | K. Saunamäki | J. Lønborg | K. Ahtarovski | N. Vejlstrup | K. Kyhl | A. Ghotbi | M. Schoos | L. Nepper-Christensen | Kathrine Ekström | Christoffer Göransson | L. Bertelsen | A. A. Ghotbi | Lars Nepper-Christensen
[1] L. Køber,et al. Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Treatment , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[2] F. Neumann,et al. Fractional Flow Reserve‐Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[3] L. Køber,et al. Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated With Increased Infarct Size and Decreased Myocardial Salvage in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[4] C. Berry,et al. Infarct size and left ventricular remodelling after preventive percutaneous coronary intervention , 2016, Heart.
[5] H. Swanton,et al. Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] L. Køber,et al. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.
[7] H. Bøtker,et al. The Third DANish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Ischemic postconditioning or deferred stent implantation versus conventional primary angioplasty and complete revascularization versus treatment of culprit lesion only: Rationale and design , 2015, American heart journal.
[8] H. Swanton,et al. Randomized Trial of Complete Versus Lesion-Only Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI and Multivessel Disease , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] Helmut Baumgartner,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[10] Volkmar Falk,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Ca , 2014, European heart journal.
[11] C. Berry,et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[12] H. Bøtker,et al. Final infarct size measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction predicts long-term clinical outcome: an observational study. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[13] Jane A. Linderbaum,et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] Katherine C. Wu,et al. CMR of microvascular obstruction and hemorrhage in myocardial infarction , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[15] C. Terkelsen,et al. Health Care System Delay and Heart Failure in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Follow-up of Population-Based Medical Registry Data , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[16] D. Holmes,et al. Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyCulprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Disease in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis , 2011 .
[17] F. Van de Werf,et al. Myocardial salvage by CMR correlates with LV remodeling and early ST-segment resolution in acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[18] Filippo Cademartiri,et al. Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on early ischemic injury, late clinical outcome, and remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty , 2010, Coronary artery disease.
[19] U. Siebert,et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[20] J. Ottervanger,et al. Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction , 2009, Coronary artery disease.
[21] S. Darby,et al. Prognostic value of coronary revascularisation-related myocardial injury: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study , 2009, Heart.
[22] S. Dymarkowski,et al. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[23] Einar Heiberg,et al. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[24] Einar Heiberg,et al. Rapid Initial Reduction of Hyperenhanced Myocardium After Reperfused First Myocardial Infarction Suggests Recovery of the Peri-Infarction Zone: One-Year Follow-Up by MRI , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[25] Sashwati Roy,et al. Characterization of the structural and functional changes in the myocardium following focal ischemia-reperfusion injury. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.
[26] J. Kastrup,et al. Short- and long-term changes in myocardial function, morphology, edema, and infarct mass after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction evaluated by serial magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, American heart journal.
[27] B. Gersh,et al. Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.
[28] B. Gersh,et al. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] Stephan G Nekolla,et al. Quantitative measurement of infarct size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging early after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-sestamibi. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] Gerhard Adam,et al. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. , 2004, Radiology.
[31] A. Baldi,et al. Increased apoptosis in remote non-infarcted myocardium in multivessel coronary disease. , 2004, International journal of cardiology.
[32] Klaus Rasmussen,et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.
[33] J. Boura,et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .
[34] A. Neskovic,et al. Left Ventricular Remodeling After Primary Coronary Angioplasty , 2002 .
[35] D. Pennell,et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.
[36] O. Simonetti,et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.
[37] Paul W. Armstrong,et al. Progressive left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Circulation.
[38] Peter Gaudron,et al. Progressive Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction Potential Mechanisms and Early Predictors , 1993, Circulation.
[39] G. Lamas,et al. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[40] K. Lee,et al. Multivessel coronary artery disease: a key predictor of short-term prognosis after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group. , 1991, American heart journal.
[41] M. Pfeffer,et al. Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.
[42] G. Lamas,et al. Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.