Environmental Regulation, Fiscal Decentralization, and Agricultural Carbon Intensity: A Challenge to Ecological Sustainability Policies in the United States

Investigating the fiscal decentralization’s effect on the carbon intensity of agricultural production may assist the United States in reaching its carbon peak and becoming carbon neutral. This paper delves into the investigation of the spatiotemporal patterns and internal relationships between fiscal decentralization, agricultural carbon intensity, and environmental regulation. The goal was achieved by using the spatial Durbin model using panel data for 49 states of the United States from 2000 to 2019. The study has found that environmental regulations play a significant role in reducing regional carbon emissions in agriculture and contribute positively to carbon emissions control. However, fiscal decentralization, which grants local governments more financial autonomy, has a positive but insignificant impact on carbon emissions, indicating that the prioritization of economic development and carbon control over environmental protection is favored by local governments. In examining the impact of environmental regulations on carbon emissions, the study reveals that fiscal decentralization does not play a substantial role in moderating this relationship. To promote low-carbon agriculture projects and ensure coordinated economic and environmental development, the study recommends optimizing the fiscal decentralization system, formulating different policies for different regions, and regulating the competencies of local governments through an effective examination system. The study concludes that it is crucial to obtain data at the city or county level to accurately understand the relationship between agricultural carbon intensity, environmental regulation, and fiscal decentralization. As a result, the central government must focus on perfecting the fiscal decentralization system, developing a differentiated agricultural carbon emission control system, controlling competition among local governments, and perfecting a political performance assessment system.

[1]  Yun Tian,et al.  Research on Environmental Governance, Local Government Competition, and Agricultural Carbon Emissions under the Goal of Carbon Peak , 2022, Agriculture.

[2]  Adnan Ahmed Sheikh,et al.  The Role of Educating the Labor Force in Sustaining a Green Economy in MINT Countries: Panel Symmetric and Asymmetric Approach , 2022, Sustainability.

[3]  Adnan Ahmed Sheikh,et al.  Nexus between Nuclear Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Asia Pacific Region: Policy toward Environmental Sustainability , 2022, Energies.

[4]  Nihal Ahmed,et al.  Nexus between Cyclical Innovation in Green Technologies and CO2 Emissions in Nordic Countries: Consent toward Environmental Sustainability , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  Muhammad Ishtiaq Ali,et al.  Causal Linkage among Agricultural Insurance, Air Pollution, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in United States: Pairwise Granger Causality Approach , 2022, Agriculture.

[6]  Zahoor Ahmed,et al.  Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint? , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  Adnan Ahmed Sheikh,et al.  Energy Diversification: A Friend or Foe to Economic Growth in Nordic Countries? A Novel Energy Diversification Approach , 2022, Energies.

[8]  Adnan Ahmed Sheikh,et al.  Green Finance and Green Energy Nexus in ASEAN Countries: A Bootstrap Panel Causality Test , 2022, Energies.

[9]  Qian He,et al.  The green paradox puzzle: fiscal decentralisation, environmental regulation, and agricultural carbon intensity in China , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  Ramez Abubakr Badeeb,et al.  The impact of fiscal decentralization, green energy, and economic policy uncertainty on sustainable environment: a new perspective from ecological footprint in five OECD countries , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[11]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  A. Rehman,et al.  How climate change is impacting the major yield crops of Pakistan? an exploration from long- and short-run estimation , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  Huan Yang,et al.  Agriculture carbon-emission reduction and changing factors behind agricultural eco-efficiency growth in China , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Environmental regulation and economic growth: A new perspective based on technical level and healthy human capital , 2021 .

[15]  T. Gudeta,et al.  The Practices and Challenges of Fiscal Decentralization: A Case of Bedelle Woreda, Oromia Region, Ethiopia , 2021 .

[16]  Jinxin Xie,et al.  China's transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and Spatial Durbin model , 2021, Energy.

[17]  Weijuan Li,et al.  Relationship and integrated development of low-carbon economy, food safety, and agricultural mechanization , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  A. Rehman,et al.  A pathway toward future sustainability: Assessing the influence of innovation shocks on CO2 emissions in developing economies , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[19]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Towards environmental Sustainability: Devolving the influence of carbon dioxide emission to population growth, climate change, Forestry, livestock and crops production in Pakistan , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[20]  James Chong,et al.  COVID-19 Losses to the Real Estate Market: An Equity Analysis , 2021 .

[21]  Neal D. Woods.  The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty‐Year Progress Report , 2021 .

[22]  P. Rhode,et al.  Industrialization and urbanization in nineteenth century America , 2021, Regional Science and Urban Economics.

[23]  Linxiu Zhang,et al.  Environmental village regulations matter: Mulch film recycling in rural China , 2021 .

[24]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Dynamic Relationships, Regional Differences, and Driving Mechanisms between Economic Development and Carbon Emissions from the Farming Industry: Empirical Evidence from Rural China , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[25]  Dan Li,et al.  Trends, distribution, and impact factors of carbon footprints of main grains production in China , 2021 .

[26]  Min Zhou,et al.  Decoupling of carbon emissions from agricultural land utilisation from economic growth in China , 2020 .

[27]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and pollution: a spatial investigation , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  Yi-hui Chen,et al.  The Measurement and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China’s Western Taiwan Straits Economic Zone , 2020, Nature Environment and Pollution Technology.

[29]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Decoupling the climatic and carbon dioxide emission influence to maize crop production in Pakistan , 2020, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.

[30]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Environmental regulation, Foreign investment behavior, and carbon emissions for 30 provinces in China , 2020 .

[31]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Will land transport infrastructure affect the energy and carbon dioxide emissions performance of China’s manufacturing industry? , 2020 .

[32]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case study , 2020 .

[33]  Yanrong Song,et al.  Financial development and carbon emissions in China since the recent world financial crisis: Evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a spatial Durbin model. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Drivers of change in China’s energy-related CO2 emissions , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Ming Zhang,et al.  How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance?-An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Lei Wen,et al.  Driving forces of national and regional CO2 emissions in China combined IPAT-E and PLS-SEM model. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Wang Jue,et al.  The Dilemma and solution of Water pollution Control from the Perspective of Environmental Regulation , 2019, E3S Web of Conferences.

[38]  Hongyu Wu,et al.  Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[39]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  Xin Gao,et al.  Assessment of Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Their Spatiotemporal Changes in China, 1997–2016 , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[41]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  How does emission trading reduce China's carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Passing the food and agricultural R&D buck? The United States and China , 2019, Food Policy.

[43]  G. Blicher-Mathiesen,et al.  Long-term nitrate response in shallow groundwater to agricultural N regulations in Denmark. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Jiaxing Pang,et al.  Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the agricultural sector of China's main grain-producing areas. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  W. Dashek.  Agricultural Pollution , 2019, A Primer on Earth Pollution: Pollution Types and Disposal.

[46]  Landon Yoder.  Compelling collective action: Does a shared pollution cap incentivize farmer cooperation to restore water quality? , 2019, International Journal of the Commons.

[47]  G. Canavire-Bacarreza,et al.  Identifying and Disentangling the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth , 2019, World Development.

[48]  D. Darwanto,et al.  The Influence Of Fiscal Policy On Agriculture Sector In Java Island , 2019, Agro Ekonomi.

[49]  Feng Dong,et al.  How Industrial Transfer Processes Impact on Haze Pollution in China: An Analysis from the Perspective of Spatial Effects , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[50]  Yunfeng Xie,et al.  Soil Pollution Management in China: A Brief Introduction , 2019, Sustainability.

[51]  Xiongfeng Pan,et al.  Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[52]  Lianshui Li,et al.  The spatial correlation and interaction between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment , 2018, Journal of Regulatory Economics.

[53]  Yifeng Li,et al.  Evolution Pattern of Technical Innovation Input and Output of Agricultural Product Processing Industry in China , 2018 .

[54]  He-rui Cui,et al.  STIRPAT-Based Driving Factor Decomposition Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Hebei, China , 2018 .

[55]  Mohamed Amine Boutabba,et al.  Agricultural technologies and carbon emissions: evidence from Jordanian economy , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[56]  Mark A. Cohen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm and Country Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis of the Porter Hypothesis , 2017, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[57]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The shadow price of CO2 emissions in China's iron and steel industry. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[58]  Xingle Long,et al.  Decoupling CO2 emissions from economic growth in agricultural sector across 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014 , 2017 .

[59]  Ning Zhang,et al.  How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis , 2017 .

[60]  Lanouar Charfeddine.  The impact of energy consumption and economic development on Ecological Footprint and CO2 emissions: Evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model , 2017 .

[61]  Qiao-Mei Liang,et al.  An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: From the perspective of fiscal decentralization , 2017 .

[62]  Huiming Zhu,et al.  The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression , 2016 .

[63]  D. Hong,et al.  Fiscal Decentralization and Agricultural Field: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam , 2016 .

[64]  Hilary A. Sigman.  Decentralization and Environmental Quality: An International Analysis of Water Pollution Levels and Variation , 2007, Land Economics.

[65]  Rishipal,et al.  Post economic reforms and Indian agriculture sector: A study of fiscal expenditure and agricultural growth , 2013 .

[66]  Michael Böcher.  A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy , 2012 .

[67]  Jae Hong Kim.  Linking Land Use Planning and Regulation to Economic Development: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[68]  K. T. Chau,et al.  An automotive thermoelectric–photovoltaic hybrid energy system using maximum power point tracking , 2011 .

[69]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  Environmental Efficiency and Environmental Total Factor Productivity Growth in China's Regional Economies (Zhongguo Quyu Huanjing Xiaolu yu Huanjing Quanyaosu Shengchanlu Zengzhang) , 2010 .

[70]  Peter M. Madsen,et al.  Does Corporate Investment Drive a “Race to the Bottom” in Environmental Protection? A Reexamination of the Effect of Environmental Regulation on Investment , 2009 .

[71]  Gang Guo,et al.  China's Local Political Budget Cycles , 2009 .

[72]  W. Oates.  On The Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions , 2008, National Tax Journal.

[73]  H. Sinn.  Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach , 2008 .

[74]  T. Ziesemer,et al.  The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption , 2009 .

[75]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models , 2007, International journal of health geographics.

[76]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom? , 2007 .

[77]  H. Zou,et al.  Fiscal decentralization, revenue and expenditure assignments, and growth in China , 2005 .

[78]  S. Managi,et al.  Competitiveness and environmental policies for agriculture: testing the Porter hypothesis , 2004 .

[79]  John A. List,et al.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Real Progress or Misspecified Models? , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[80]  J. Svensson,et al.  Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy , 2003 .

[81]  J. Paul Elhorst,et al.  Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models , 2003 .

[82]  Matthew Potoski,et al.  Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom? , 2001 .

[83]  J. Lin,et al.  Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in China* , 2000, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[84]  L. Anselin,et al.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .