Data-Driven Representative Day Selection for Investment Decisions: A Cost-Oriented Approach

Power system investment planning problems become intractable due to the vast variability that characterizes system operation and the increasing complexity of the optimization model to capture the characteristics of renewable energy sources. In this context, making optimal investment decisions by considering every operating period is unrealistic and inefficient. The conventional solution to address this computational issue is to select a limited number of representative operating periods by clustering the input demand-generation patterns while preserving the key statistical features of the original population. However, for an investment model that contains highly complex non-linear relationship between input data and optimal investment decisions, selecting representative periods by relying on only input data becomes inefficient. This paper proposes a novel investment cost-oriented representative day selection framework for large scale multi-spacial investment problems, which performs clustering directly based on the investment decisions for each generation technology at each location associated with each individual day. Additionally, dimensionality reduction is performed to ensure that the proposed method is feasible for large-scale power systems and high-resolution input data. The superior performance of the proposed method is demonstrated through a series of case studies with different levels of modeling complexity.

[1]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Whole-System Assessment of the Benefits of Integrated Electricity and Heat System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Nate Blair,et al.  Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) Model Documentation: Version 2016 , 2016 .

[3]  Goran Strbac,et al.  An objective-based scenario selection method for transmission network expansion planning with multivariate stochasticity in load and renewable energy sources , 2018 .

[4]  Albert Moser,et al.  Novel Methodology for Selecting Representative Operating Points for the TNEP , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Selecting Representative Days for Capturing the Implications of Integrating Intermittent Renewables in Generation Expansion Planning Problems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[7]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Probabilistic Peak Load Estimation in Smart Cities Using Smart Meter Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Scenario reduction for risk-averse electricity trading , 2010 .

[9]  Jianping Yin,et al.  Improved Deep Embedded Clustering with Local Structure Preservation , 2017, IJCAI.

[10]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Correlated wind-power production and electric load scenarios for investment decisions , 2013 .

[11]  Sonja Wogrin,et al.  Enhanced Representative Days and System States Modeling for Energy Storage Investment Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[13]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  Chronological Time-Period Clustering for Optimal Capacity Expansion Planning With Storage , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  A. Conejo,et al.  Scenario Reduction for Futures Market Trading in Electricity Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Hierarchical Clustering to Find Representative Operating Periods for Capacity-Expansion Modeling , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  Curse of Dimensionality , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[17]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Whole-Systems Assessment of the Value of Energy Storage in Low-Carbon Electricity Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Quentin Ploussard,et al.  An Operational State Aggregation Technique for Transmission Expansion Planning Based on Line Benefits , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Mort D. Webster,et al.  Optimal Selection of Sample Weeks for Approximating the Net Load in Generation Planning Problems , 2013 .

[20]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Representing Operational Flexibility in Generation Expansion Planning Through Convex Relaxation of Unit Commitment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Desta Z. Fitiwi,et al.  A new approach of clustering operational states for power network expansion planning problems dealing with RES (renewable energy source) generation operational variability and uncertainty , 2015 .

[22]  A. Conejo,et al.  Toward Fully Renewable Electric Energy Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[24]  Hedayat Saboori,et al.  Considering Carbon Capture and Storage in Electricity Generation Expansion Planning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.