Prior preferences beneficially influence social and non-social learning

[1]  B. Love,et al.  Social Information Is Integrated into Value and Confidence Judgments According to Its Reliability , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  How People Use Social Information to Find out What to Want in the Paradigmatic Case of Inter-temporal Preferences , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Behavioral contagion during learning about another agent’s risk-preferences acts on the neural representation of decision-risk , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Efficient Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation and WAIC for BayesianModels , 2015 .

[5]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[6]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Human Consensus Decision-Making , 2015, Neuron.

[7]  Cendri A. C. Hutcherson,et al.  Dietary Self-Control Is Related to the Speed With Which Attributes of Healthfulness and Tastiness Are Processed , 2015, Psychological science.

[8]  Zeb Kurth-Nelson,et al.  Learning-Induced Plasticity in Medial Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Preference Malleability , 2015, Neuron.

[9]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  fMRI and EEG Predictors of Dynamic Decision Parameters during Human Reinforcement Learning , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Joseph T. McGuire,et al.  Functionally Dissociable Influences on Learning Rate in a Dynamic Environment , 2014, Neuron.

[11]  E. Fehr,et al.  The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[13]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[14]  Keise Izuma,et al.  Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[15]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Empathic choice involves vmPFC value signals that are modulated by social processing implemented in IPL. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[17]  R. Dolan,et al.  Confidence in value-based choice , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Miriam Kesselmeier,et al.  Fast and accurate calculations for cumulative first-passage time distributions in Wiener diffusion models , 2012 .

[19]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Deconstruction and reconstruction of an anomaly , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  An Agent Independent Axis for Executed and Modeled Choice in Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[21]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions , 2012, Neuron.

[22]  R. Dolan,et al.  Structure of orbitofrontal cortex predicts social influence , 2012, Current Biology.

[23]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Social Influence Modulates the Neural Computation of Value , 2011, Psychological science.

[25]  Konrad Kording,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Bayesian Models: the Structure of the World, Uncertainty, Behavior, and the Brain , 2022 .

[26]  Robert C. Wilson,et al.  An Approximately Bayesian Delta-Rule Model Explains the Dynamics of Belief Updating in a Changing Environment , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Pamela A Shaw,et al.  Exact and Asymptotic Weighted Logrank Tests for Interval Censored Data: The interval R package. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[28]  R. Dolan,et al.  How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects , 2010, Current Biology.

[29]  Karl J. Friston.  The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  D. Navarro,et al.  Fast and accurate calculations for first-passage times in Wiener diffusion models , 2009 .

[32]  G. Fernández,et al.  Reinforcement Learning Signal Predicts Social Conformity , 2009, Neuron.

[33]  Mark W Woolrich,et al.  Associative learning of social value , 2008, Nature.

[34]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[36]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[38]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Special issue on “Probabilistic models of cognition , 2022 .

[39]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[40]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  J. Krueger,et al.  The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[43]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[44]  P. M. West.  Predicting Preferences: An Examination of Agent Learning , 1996 .

[45]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment? , 1996 .

[46]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[47]  D. R. Williams,et al.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[48]  Joachim Vandekerckhove,et al.  The RWiener Package: an R Package Providing Distribution Functions for the Wiener Diffusion Model , 2014, R J..

[49]  Bram P. Buunk,et al.  Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research , 2000 .

[50]  Joachim I. Krueger,et al.  The projective perception of the social world: A building block of social comparison processes. , 2000 .

[51]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Handbook of social comparison : theory and research , 2000 .

[52]  J. Krueger.  On the Perception of Social Consensus , 1998 .

[53]  J. Krueger,et al.  The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.