Role of Temporal Integration and Fluctuation Detection in the Highly Irregular Firing of a Leaky Integrator Neuron Model with Partial Reset

Partial reset is a simple and powerful tool for controlling the irregularity of spike trains fired by a leaky integrator neuron model with random inputs. In particular, a single neuron model with a realistic membrane time constant of 10 ms can reproduce the highly irregular firing of cortical neurons reported by Softky and Koch (1993). In this article, the mechanisms by which partial reset affects the firing pattern are investigated. Itisshown theoretically that partial reset is equivalent to the use of a time-dependent threshold, similar to a technique proposed by Wilbur and Rinzel (1983) to produce high irregularity. This equivalent model allows establishing that temporal integration and fluctuation detection can coexist and cooperate to cause highly irregular firing. This study also reveals that reverse correlation curves cannot be used reliably to assess the causes of firing. For instance, they do not reveal temporal integration when it takes place. Further, the peak near time zero does not always indicate coincidence detection. An alternative qualitative method is proposed here for that later purpose. Finally, it is noted that as the reset becomes weaker, the firing pattern shows a progressive transition from regular firing, to random, to temporally clustered, and eventually to bursting firing. Concurrently the slope of the transfer function increases. Thus, simulations suggest a correlation between high gain and highly irregular firing.

[1]  William R. Softky,et al.  Simple codes versus efficient codes , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  William T Newsome,et al.  Is there a signal in the noise? , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  Summation and multiplication: two distinct operation domains of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons , 1991 .

[4]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  'Balancing' of Conductances May Explain Irregular Cortical Spiking , 1995 .

[6]  J Rinzel,et al.  A theoretical basis for large coefficient of variation and bimodality in neuronal interspike interval distributions. , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  T. Geisel,et al.  Markov analysis of stochastic resonance in a periodically driven integrate-and-fire neuron. , 1998, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[8]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  A Top-Down Model for Neuronal Synchronization , 1994 .

[9]  Gail A. Carpenter,et al.  Bursting Phenomena in Excitable Membranes , 1979 .

[10]  William R. Softky,et al.  The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Zipser,et al.  A spiking network model of short-term active memory , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  Modelling of the high firing variability of real cortical neurons with the temporal noisy-leaky integrator neuron model , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94).

[13]  Marius Usher,et al.  Network Amplification of Local Fluctuations Causes High Spike Rate Variability, Fractal Firing Patterns and Oscillatory Local Field Potentials , 1994, Neural Computation.

[14]  Christof Koch,et al.  Cortical Cells Should Fire Regularly, But Do Not , 1999, Neural Computation.

[15]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  RAPID STATE SWITCHING IN BALANCED CORTICAL NETWORK MODELS , 1995 .

[16]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[17]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of bursting cells in area MT in the behaving monkey , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.