A comparative performance test of standard, medium- and high-throughput comet assays.

A serious limitation of the conventional comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) is the restriction on the number of samples that can be processed in one experiment, imposed by the size of the electrophoresis platform. One approach to increasing throughput is to reduce the size of gels. We here compare the conventional system of two large gels on a microscope slide, with two recent developments, namely 12 minigels per slide, and a format with 96 minigels on GelBond® film. We used cells treated with X-rays or methylmethanesulphonate (MMS). The level of damage detected (% tail DNA) in X-irradiated or MMS-treated cells was not affected by the format used. Parallel experiments, using all three formats, were performed with MMS-treated cells in two independent laboratories; the difference in results between the two laboratories was of borderline significance. The potential problem of anomalous comets seen at the border of the gel, the so-called 'edge effects', has been addressed. A reliable, high throughput comet assay has applications in genotoxicity testing (particularly for in vivo studies with samples from different organs) as well as ecogenotoxicology and human biomonitoring, where the numbers of samples collected can be considerable.

[1]  C. Guguen-Guillouzo,et al.  The application of 3D micropatterning of agarose substrate for cell culture and in situ comet assays. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[2]  Detlef Ritter,et al.  Genotoxicity testing in vitro - development of a higher throughput analysis method based on the comet assay. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  A. Collins,et al.  The Comet Assay: A Sensitive and Quantitative Method for Analysis of DNA Damage , 2011 .

[4]  Nicklas Raun Jacobsen,et al.  Pulmonary exposure to carbon black by inhalation or instillation in pregnant mice: Effects on liver DNA strand breaks in dams and offspring , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[5]  Steffen Loft,et al.  An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[6]  I. Witte,et al.  Performance of the comet assay in a high-throughput version. , 2009, Mutation research.

[7]  Nicola J Hewitt,et al.  A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  Amaya Azqueta,et al.  The influence of scoring method on variability in results obtained with the comet assay. , 2011, Mutagenesis.

[9]  I. Witte,et al.  The ability of the high-throughput comet assay to measure the sensitivity of five cell lines toward methyl methanesulfonate, hydrogen peroxide, and pentachlorophenol. , 2010, Mutation research.

[10]  David K. Wood,et al.  Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  David H Phillips,et al.  Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial. , 2010, Mutagenesis.

[12]  J. Mclean,et al.  Comet assay: rapid processing of multiple samples. , 2000, Mutation research.

[13]  G. Brunborg,et al.  Twelve-gel slide format optimised for comet assay and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. , 2010, Toxicology letters.