Damage from Corrective Advertising: Causes and Cures

Abstract Corrective advertising can be problematic because it undermines responses both to other products advertised by the corrected firm and to products advertised by second-party advertisers. However, a positive reputation insulates second-party firms from these carryover effects, provided that this reputation is based on an endorsement from an independent regulator. Furthermore, firm responses that include an explanation for the misleading claim prove to be effective in avoiding the negative side effects of correction. These findings add to the correction literature by (1) showing that this form of regulation can have much broader side effects than demonstrated previously, (2) identifying distrust as the mechanism by which these effects occur, and (3) suggesting strategies to protect firms from the negative side effects of correction. The findings also support the defensive consumer distrust model and help define the scope of this model.

[1]  K. Mcgraw.  Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Richard W. Pollay,et al.  The Distorted Mirror: Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of Advertising , 1986 .

[3]  R. Petty,et al.  Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny , 1995 .

[4]  G. Johar.  Intended and Unintended Effects of Corrective Advertising on Beliefs and Evaluations: An Exploratory Analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. Mazis.  FTC v. Novartis: The Return of Corrective Advertising? , 2001 .

[7]  J. Rotter.  A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[8]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  A Field Study of Corrective Advertising Effectiveness , 1986 .

[10]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[11]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[12]  Philip G. Kuehl,et al.  The "Corrective Advertising" Remedy of the FTC: An Experimental Evaluation , 1974 .

[13]  T. Ambler,et al.  The Dark Side of Long-Term Relationships in Marketing Services , 1999 .

[14]  T. Tyebjee.  The Role of Publicity in FTC Corrective Advertising Remedies , 1982 .

[15]  Robert F. Dyer,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Corrective Advertising , 1978 .

[16]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[18]  Richard W. Mizerski,et al.  A Controlled Field Study of Corrective Advertising Using Multiple Exposures and a Commercial Medium , 1980 .

[19]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Marketing's “Scarlet Letter”: The Theory and Practice of Corrective Advertising , 1984 .

[20]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Motivated reasoning with stereotypes: Activation, application, and inhibition. , 1999 .

[21]  S. Robinson.  Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Bernhardt,et al.  Day-after Recall of Listerine Corrective Commercials , 1983 .

[23]  J. Nkonge.  How communication medium and message format affect corrective advertising , 1984 .

[24]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[25]  D. M. Gardner.  Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach , 1975 .

[26]  Frederick A. Russ,et al.  Detecting and Correcting Deceptive Advertising , 1979 .

[27]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  The use of concurrent disclosures to correct invalid inferences. , 2000 .

[28]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Alan G. Sawyer,et al.  The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Diana C. Robertson,et al.  Regulatory Exposure of Deceptive Marketing and Its Impact on Firm Value , 2009 .

[31]  Peter R. Darke,et al.  The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust , 2007 .

[32]  Margaret C. Nelson,et al.  Corrective Advertising and Affirmative Disclosure Statements: Their Potential for Confusing and Misleading the Consumer: , 1982 .

[33]  D. M. Gardner.  Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach , 1975 .

[34]  Frederick A. Russ,et al.  The Effects of Corrective Advertising on Company Image , 1982 .

[35]  M. Mazis,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of a Proposed Corrective Advertising Remedy , 1976 .

[36]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[37]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[38]  Philip G. Kuehl,et al.  The “Corrective Advertising” Remedy of the FTC: An Experimental Evaluation , 1974 .

[39]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice , 2004 .