Using Smartphones to Collect Bicycle Travel Data in Texas

Researchers believed that if smartphones could prove to be an effective tool for collecting bicycle travel data, the information could be used for aiding decision making as to what types of facilities users prefer and guiding decisions about future facilities. If adequate facilities were provided, the mode share of bicyclists would increase and lead to a reduction in congestion. Thus, researchers used an existing smartphone application, CycleTracks, developed by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, to develop this study. Austin-area bicyclists were targeted to test the application. Austin’s strong cycling culture, its known bicycle friendliness, and the presence of several universities including the University of Texas made it an ideal test environment. Bicycle route data was collected between May 1 and October 31, 2011 during which time over 3,600 routes were recorded. About 300 bicyclists provided their age, gender, bicycling frequency, home zip code, work zip code, and school zip code. Eighty-three percent of these participants indicated that they bicycle daily or several times per week. Most participants live and work in the central area of Austin. Seventy percent of the participants were male and 30 percent female. There were slightly more participants in the 20-29 age range than the 30-39 and 40-49 age ranges. Many defined the purpose of the bicycle trip: 85 percent of the trips were for the purpose of transportation vs. recreation. Using algorithms within ArcGIS, researchers were able to match almost 90 percent of the bicycle routes. The collected dataset provided a rich set of bicyclist and route attributes useful for identifying route choice decisions. Despite the manageable challenges of the data cleaning, network completion, and map-matching process, the amount of information provided by the use of CycleTracks far exceeds what would be available using other data collection methods.

[1]  John E Abraham,et al.  Influences on bicycle use , 2007 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Efficient Map Matching of Large Global Positioning System Data Sets: Tests on Speed-Monitoring Experiment in Zürich , 2005 .

[3]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Walking and Bicycling: An Evaluation of Environmental Audit Instruments , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[4]  M. Duncan,et al.  GIS or GPS? A comparison of two methods for assessing route taken during active transport. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Thomas Walsh,et al.  BICYCLE STRESS LEVEL AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE URBAN AND SUBURBAN BICYCLE COMPATIBILITY , 1994 .

[6]  Tae-Kyung Sung,et al.  Development of a map matching method using the multiple hypothesis technique , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[7]  Billy Charlton,et al.  A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California , 2011 .

[8]  John Krumm,et al.  Hidden Markov map matching through noise and sparseness , 2009, GIS.

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems without Additional Information , 2009 .

[10]  S M Turner,et al.  BICYCLE SUITABILITY CRITERIA: LITERATURE REVIEW AND STATE-OF-THE-PRACTICE SURVEY , 1997 .

[11]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Current map-matching algorithms for transport applications: State-of-the art and future research directions , 2007 .

[12]  Lisa Aultman-Hall,et al.  Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning , 1997 .

[13]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Route choice of cyclists in Zurich , 2010 .

[14]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bicycle Route Choice Model Developed from Revealed-Preference GPS Data , 2011 .

[15]  Katsumi Takahashi,et al.  Modeling of Bicycle Route and Destination Choice Behavior for Bicycle Road Network Plan , 2000 .

[16]  E. K. Burns,et al.  Cycling to Work in Phoenix: Route Choice, Travel Behavior, and Commuter Characteristics , 2001 .

[17]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[18]  M. Bradley,et al.  REALISM AND ADAPTATION IN DESIGNING HYPOTHETICAL TRAVEL CHOICE CONCEPTS , 1988 .

[19]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  GIS-based Map-matching: Development and Demonstration of a Postprocessing Map-matching Algorithm for Transportation Research , 2011, AGILE Conf..

[20]  Gartenbau Forstwirtschaft Fischerei Ernährung Landwirtschaft Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences , 2011 .

[21]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US , 2009 .

[22]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[23]  Venkat R. Vattikuti,et al.  Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service , 1997 .

[24]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists’ travel , 2007 .

[25]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Map-matching of GPS traces on high-resolution navigation networks using the Multiple Hypothesis Technique (MHT) , 2009 .

[26]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Intersection Level of Service for the Bicycle Through Movement , 2003 .

[27]  K. Krizek Two Approaches to Valuing Some of Bicycle Facilities' Presumed Benefits: Propose a session for the 2007 National Planning Conference in the City of Brotherly Love , 2006 .