But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.

Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) represent conditions under which the TLV Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) believes that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed without adverse effect. A detailed research was made of the references in the 1976 Documentation to data on "industrial experience" and "experimental human studies." The references, sorted for those including both the incidence of adverse effects and the corresponding exposure, yielded 158 paired sets of data. Upon analysis it was found that, where the exposure was at or below the TLV, only a minority of studies showed no adverse effects (11 instances) and the remainder indicated that up to 100% of those exposed had been affected (8 instances of 100%). Although, the TLVs were poorly correlated with the incidence of adverse effects, a surprisingly strong correlation was found between the TLVs and the exposures reported in the corresponding studies cited in the Documentation. Upon repeating the search of references to human experience, at or below the TLVs, listed in the more recent, 1986 edition of the Documentation, a very similar picture has emerged from the 72 sets of clear data which were found. Again, only a minority of studies showed no adverse effects and TLVs were poorly correlated with the incidence of adverse effect and well correlated with the measured exposure. Finally, a careful analysis revealed that authors' conclusions in the references (cited in the 1976 Documentation) regarding exposure-response relationships at or below the TLVs were generally found to be at odds with the conclusions of the TLV Committee. These findings suggest that those TLVs which are justified on the basis of "industrial experience" are not based purely upon health considerations. Rather, those TLVs appear to reflect the levels of exposure which were perceived at the time to be achievable in industry. Thus, ACGIH TLVs may represent guides of levels which have been achieved, but they are certainly not thresholds.

[1]  P. Bidstrup,et al.  Chronic mercury poisoning in men repairing direct-current meters. , 1951, Lancet.

[2]  J. W. Meigs,et al.  Chloracne from an unusual exposure to arochlor. , 1954, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[3]  The Acute Toxicity of Cyanogen , 1960 .

[4]  L. Pagnotto,et al.  Industrial benzene exposure from petroleum naphtha. I. Rubber coating industry. , 1961, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  R. Passmore BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS. , 1964, Lancet.

[6]  R. Joyner CHRONIC TOXICITY OF ETHYLENE OXIDE. A STUDY OF HUMAN RESPONSES TO LONG-TERM LOW-LEVEL EXPOSURES. , 1964, Archives of environmental health.

[7]  C. Zenz,et al.  Human responses to controlled vanadium pentoxide exposure. , 1967, Archives of environmental health.

[8]  R. D. Stewart,et al.  Human exposure to styrene vapor. , 1968, Archives of environmental health.

[9]  British Occup. Hyg. Soc. Committee on Hygiene Standards Hygiene standards for chrysotile asbestos dust. , 1968 .

[10]  R. D. Stewart,et al.  Monitoring exposures to vinyl chloride vapor: breath analysis and continuous air sampling. , 1969, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  R D Stewart,et al.  Experimental human exposure to vapor of propylene glycol monomethyl ether. Experimental human exposure. , 1970, Archives of environmental health.

[12]  Roscoe B. Hogan,et al.  Occupational safety and health act , 1977 .

[13]  Current confidence in occupational health. , 1979 .

[14]  D. Henschler Exposure limits: history, philosophy, future developments. , 1984, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  S M Rappaport,et al.  The rules of the game: an analysis of OSHA's enforcement strategy. , 1984, American journal of industrial medicine.

[16]  Permissible and control limits of toxic substances at places of work in Japan. , 1985, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  P. D. Silva TLVs to Protect “Nearly All Workers” , 1986 .

[18]  Threshold limit values: any alternative? , 1988, American journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  P Lundberg,et al.  Swedish occupational exposure limits: developments in scientific evaluation and documentation. , 1988, American journal of industrial medicine.

[20]  Steve Selvin,et al.  A Strategy for Assessing Exposures with Reference to Multiple Limits , 1988 .

[21]  B. Castleman,et al.  Corporate influence on threshold limit values. , 1988, American journal of industrial medicine.

[22]  Response to "Corporate Influence on Threshold Limit Values". , 1988, American journal of industrial medicine.