The Impact of Stereoscopic Three-Dimensional (3-D) Advertising

The popularity of stereoscopic 3-D technology is encouraging advertisers to adopt this format as a new advertising tool in diverse contexts. This research investigates the impact of nonglasses and glasses types of stereoscopic 3-D advertising, and proposes a theoretical model examining the role of presence in advertising effectiveness. Due to their power to increase presence, both stereoscopic 3-D advertising formats have a significantly stronger impact on diverse marketing variables than flat 3-D advertising. A structural equation model reveals the process through which presence affects advertising effectiveness by enhancing enjoyment and increasing perceived product knowledge. In addition, the moderating effects of novelty and cybersickness on presence are identified.

[1]  C. Heeter.  Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences , 2000 .

[2]  Byungho Park,et al.  The Limited Capacity Model of Mediated Message Processing and Education , 2008 .

[3]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[4]  P. Coulton,et al.  Delivering 3D advertising to mobile phones , 2006, 2006 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[5]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[6]  A. Rao,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations , 1988 .

[7]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[8]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Consumer Learning and the Effects of Virtual Experience Relative to Indirect and Direct Product Experience , 2008 .

[11]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[12]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment , 2004 .

[13]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[14]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Cognitive response to advertising and trial: Belief strength, belief confidence and product curiosity. , 1988 .

[15]  Brenda Massetti,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation , 1996, MIS Q..

[16]  K. Seltman.  Marketing for management. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[17]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience With the Attitude Object , 2004 .

[18]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Nightly@nbc.com: Audience Scope and the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. , 1995 .

[19]  Ching-Jui Keng,et al.  Impact of Telepresence Levels on Internet Advertising Effects , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  J. Craig Andrews,et al.  The Dimensionality of Beliefs toward Advertising in General , 1989 .

[21]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  MEASURING PRESENCE: A LITERATURE-BASED APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARDIZED PAPER-AND-PENCIL INSTRUMENT , 2000 .

[22]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Role of Virtual Experience in Consumer Learning , 2003 .

[23]  Ginger Rosenkrans,et al.  The Creativeness and Effectiveness of Online Interactive Rich Media Advertising , 2009 .

[24]  H. E. Krugman.  THE IMPACT OF TELEVISION ADVERTISING: LEARNING WITHOUT INVOLVEMENT , 1965 .

[25]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination , 2001 .

[26]  Srinivas Durvasula,et al.  The Effects of Advertising Distinctiveness and Message Content Involvement on Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising , 1992 .

[27]  Hong-Youl Ha,et al.  The Relationships between 3-D Advertisings and Risk Perceptions on the Web: The Role of Brand and Emotion , 2005 .

[28]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Television Videographics and Lecture Familiarity on Adult Cardiac Orienting Responses and Memory , 1992 .

[29]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[30]  John L. Sherry.  Flow and Media Enjoyment , 2004 .

[31]  Michael Meehan,et al.  Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments , 2002, SIGGRAPH.

[32]  Alice E. Courtney,et al.  Advertising in America: The Consumer View , 1969 .

[33]  Cheryl Campanella Bracken,et al.  Presence and Image Quality: The Case of High-Definition Television , 2005 .

[34]  Xin Wang,et al.  Evaluating the Usability of an Auto-stereoscopic Display , 2007, HCI.

[35]  Mary Anne Raymond,et al.  Consumer Responses to Perceived Telepresence in the Online Advertising Environment: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 2004 .

[36]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[37]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency , 1992 .

[38]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[39]  Kay M Stanney,et al.  Effects of low stereo acuity on performance, presence and sickness within a virtual environment. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[40]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: An Information Processing Analysis , 1978 .

[41]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[42]  J. Lewis,et al.  NOVELTY, COMPLEXITY, INCONGRUITY, EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION, AND THE GSR. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Young Eun Lee,et al.  The Effects of Virtual Reality on Consumer Learning: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[44]  Alaina Kanfer,et al.  Survey of Internet users’ attitudes toward Internet advertising , 1999 .

[45]  John A. Rupkalvis.  Human considerations in stereoscopic displays , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[46]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[47]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. , 1987 .

[48]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments , 2000, SGCH.

[49]  W. Belson.  The Effects Of Television , 1957 .

[50]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[51]  P. Nelson.  Advertising as Information , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[53]  M. Lombard,et al.  Presence and Television: The Role of Screen Size. , 2000 .

[54]  Hairong Li,et al.  Impact of 3-D Advertising on Product Knowledge, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Presence , 2002 .

[55]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Distal Attribution and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[56]  Scot Burton,et al.  Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective , 1990 .

[57]  D. Grigorovici,et al.  Experiencing Interactive Advertising beyond Rich Media , 2004 .

[58]  advertising value and advertising on the web - Blog @management , 2012 .

[59]  Ronald A. Yaros,et al.  Examining the Influence of Telepresence on Spectator and Player Processing of Real and Fictitious Brands in a Computer Game , 2006 .

[60]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[61]  Hairong Li,et al.  Experiential Ecommerce: A Summary of Research Investigating the Impact of Virtual Experience on Consumer Learning , 2002 .

[62]  Asuncióan Beerli,et al.  Design and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Advertising Effectiveness in the Printed Media , 1999 .

[63]  M. Brucks.  The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[64]  G. Tellis.  Effective Frequency: One Exposure or Three Factors? , 2006 .

[65]  Hairong Li,et al.  Characteristics of virtual experience in electronic commerce: A protocol analysis , 2001 .

[66]  T. Ambler,et al.  How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know? , 1999 .

[67]  Neil A. Dodgson,et al.  Autostereoscopic 3D displays , 2005, Computer.

[68]  Diane J. Schiano.  Lessons from LambdaMOO: A Social, Text-Based Virtual Environment , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[69]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[70]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Telepresence via Television: Two Dimensions of Telepresence May Have Different Connections to Memory and Persuasion , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[71]  P. Nelson.  Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[72]  Annie Lang,et al.  The influence of form and presentation attributes of media on emotion , 2010 .

[73]  C. Heeter.  Communication research on consumer VR , 1995 .

[74]  Supercomputing Applications.  SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD INTERNET ADVERTISING , 1999 .

[75]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[76]  R. So,et al.  Sensation of presence and cybersickness in applications of virtual reality for advanced rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[77]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[78]  Steven Shepard,et al.  The Best Global Brands , 1993 .

[79]  M. Whitton,et al.  Physiological Measures of Presence in Virtual Environments , 2001 .