Period elongation-based framework for operative assessment of the variation of seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings during aftershock sequences

Safety assessment of structures and/or critical infrastructures is a key factor in post-seismic decision-making. In this context we present a performance-based framework for modeling time-variant vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings during aftershock sequences. Structural damage is associated with first eigenperiod elongation, a performance metric whose measurement can complement visual inspection and assessment of structural health as a post-seismic operative tool. The proposed framework is applied for a series of reinforced concrete building models and two aftershock sequences. Damage states are defined using thresholds of period elongation. Numerical models of the buildings in each damage state are considered and their fragility curves are computed. The time-variant vulnerability is modeled with Markov chain as a function of the characteristics of the aftershocks sequence. Finally, the probabilities of the damage states are computed as a function of time during two real aftershock sequences.

[1]  M. Navarro,et al.  Changes in dynamic characteristics of Lorca RC buildings from pre- and post-earthquake ambient vibration data , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[2]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[3]  Michalis Fragiadakis,et al.  Influence of modeling parameters on the response of degrading systems to near-field ground motions , 2013 .

[4]  B. Margaris,et al.  Uncertainties in the estimation of earthquake magnitudes in Greece , 2002 .

[5]  Matthieu Perrault,et al.  Correlation between Ground Motion and Building Response using California Earthquake Records , 2015 .

[6]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings , 2006 .

[7]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  The 1994 Northridge earthquake sequence in California: Seismological and tectonic aspects , 1995 .

[8]  G. Grünthal European Macroseismic Scale 1998 , 1998 .

[9]  J. Douglas,et al.  Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[10]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms , 2011 .

[11]  E. M. Scordilis,et al.  Empirical Peak Ground-Motion Predictive Relations for Shallow Earthquakes in Greece , 2003 .

[12]  Alexandru Aldea,et al.  Using experimental data to reduce the single-building sigma of fragility curves: case study of the BRD tower in Bucharest, Romania , 2013, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[13]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[14]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges , 2003 .

[15]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .

[16]  W. Marzocchi,et al.  A performance‐based framework for adaptive seismic aftershock risk assessment , 2014 .

[17]  Selim Günay,et al.  Progressive Collapse Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls considering In-Plane/Out-of-Plane Interaction , 2015 .

[18]  George G. Penelis,et al.  Concrete Buildings in Seismic Regions , 2014 .

[19]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Closed‐form aftershock reliability of damage‐cumulating elastic‐perfectly‐plastic systems , 2014 .

[20]  L. Baillet,et al.  Structural-change localization and monitoring through a perturbation-based inverse problem. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Source complexity of the 1994 Northridge earthquake and its relation to aftershock mechanisms , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[22]  Carvalho,et al.  Designers' Guide to EN 1998-1 and 1998-5. Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistant Structures , 2005 .

[23]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  On-site early-warning system for Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan) , 2015 .

[24]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[25]  Aurore Laurendeau,et al.  Eurocode 8-compatible synthetic time-series as input to dynamic analysis , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Influence of stiffness degradation on strength demands of structures built on soft soil sites , 2002 .

[27]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Development of comprehensive earthquake loss scenarios for a Greek and a Turkish city - structural aspects , 2010 .

[28]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Bias assessment in Incremental Dynamic Analysis due to record scaling , 2014 .

[29]  Andreas J. Kappos Seismic Vulnerability and Loss Assessment for Buildings in Greece , 2013 .

[30]  C. Zhai,et al.  The damage investigation of inelastic SDOF structure under the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions , 2014 .

[31]  F. Dunand,et al.  Utilisation du bruit de fond pour l'analyse des dommages des bâtiments de Boumerdes suite au séisme du 21 mai 2003 , 2004 .

[32]  Benedikt Halldorsson,et al.  Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions , 2005 .

[33]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Prediction of inelastic response periods of buildings based on intensity measures and analytical model parameters , 2014 .

[34]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Experimental and numerical evaluation of the fundamental period of undamaged and damaged RC framed buildings , 2010 .

[35]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[36]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Framework of aftershock fragility assessment–case studies: older California reinforced concrete building frames , 2015 .

[37]  J. Regnier,et al.  Contribution of ambient vibration recordings (Free-field and buildings) for post-seismic analysis: the case of the Mw 7.3 MARTINIQUE (French lesser ANTILLES) earthquake, november 29, 2007 , 2013 .

[38]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes , 2009 .

[39]  Anastasia Kiratzi,et al.  The instability of the MW and ML comparison for earthquakes in Greece for the period 1969 to 2007 , 2010 .

[40]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Simple and complex modelling of timber-framed masonry walls in Pombalino buildings , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[41]  Anastasios Sextos,et al.  Inelastic spectra to predict period elongation of structures under earthquake loading , 2015 .

[42]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[43]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Implications of cumulated seismic damage on the seismic performance of unreinforced masonry buildings , 2014 .