Structure of human cathepsin D: comparison of inhibitor binding and subdomain displacement with other aspartic proteases.

Cathepsin D (EC 3.4.23.5) (CatD) is an intracellular aspartic protease (AP) that is normally found in the lysosomes of higher eukaryotes. CatD shares two structural features with lysosomal enzymes that distinguish it from most secreted, extracellular APs. First, the mature enzyme from humans is found as a two-chain enzyme as a result of post-translational cleavage and removal of an insertion loop in the N-domain. Second, CatD contains phosphorylated, N-linked oligosaccharides that target the enzyme to lysosomes via man-nose-6-phosphate receptors (MPR). Interest in CatD as a target for drug design results from its association with several biological processes of therapeutic significance, particularly breast cancer and Alzheimer’s disease (Table 1). Recent studies have implicated CatD in the processing of (β-amyloid precursor protein to promote amyloid plaque formation in Alzheimer’s brain. Numerous studies of primary breast cancers have demonstrated that elevated levels of CatD were correlated with an increased risk of metastasis and shorter relapse-free survival. High levels of CatD produced in the vicinity of the growing tumor may degrade the extracellular matrix, either directly or indirectly by potentiating the activity of other tissue proteases, such as collagenase, and thereby promote tumor growth and metastasis. While a role for CatD or other APs in metastasis has been questioned by recent results that show a negative effect of pepstatin A in an in vitro invasion assay using breast cancer-derived MCF7 cells, new studies have revealed that elevated levels of CatD secretion in breast cancers correlate with tumor aggressiveness.

[1]  A. Lajtha,et al.  The Distribution of Cathepsin D Activity in Adult and Aging Human Brain Regions , 1992, Journal of neurochemistry.

[2]  R. Scott,et al.  Processing of the beta-amyloid precursor. Multiple proteases generate and degrade potentially amyloidogenic fragments. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  A. Haase,et al.  Neuropathological changes in scrapie and Alzheimer's disease are associated with increased expression of apolipoprotein E and cathepsin D in astrocytes , 1991, Journal of virology.

[4]  A. Ferrando,et al.  Cathepsin D in breast secretions from women with breast cancer. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  M. Fusek,et al.  Two crystal structures for cathepsin D: the lysosomal targeting signal and active site. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[6]  A. Barrett Proteinases in Mammalian Cells and Tissues , 1977 .

[7]  G. Cohen,et al.  Structure and refinement at 1.8 A resolution of the aspartic proteinase from Rhizopus chinensis. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  C. Abad-Zapatero,et al.  Revised 2.3 Å structure of porcine pepsin: Evidence for a flexible subdomain , 1990, Proteins.

[9]  Y. Satow,et al.  Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin Fab McPC603. An X-ray diffraction study at 2.7 A. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  A. V. D. Drift,et al.  The selectivity of cathepsin D suggests an involvement of the enzyme in the generation of T-cell epitopes. , 1989 .

[11]  A. Matus,et al.  Age-related increase in a cathepsin D like protease that degrades brain microtubule-associated proteins. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[12]  R E Cachau,et al.  Crystal structures of native and inhibited forms of human cathepsin D: implications for lysosomal targeting and drug design. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  T. L. Blundell,et al.  X-ray analyses of peptide–inhibitor complexes define the structural basis of specificity for human and mouse renins , 1992, Nature.

[14]  A. Warner,et al.  Thiol protease and cathepsin D activities in selected tissues and cultured cells from normal and dystrophic mice. , 1987, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[15]  J. Tang,et al.  Structures at the proteolytic processing region of cathepsin D. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  H. Rochefort,et al.  Biological and clinical significance of cathepsin D in breast cancer. , 1992, Acta oncologica.

[17]  T. Blundell,et al.  High‐resolution X‐ray diffraction study of the complex between endothiapepsin and an oligopeptide inhibitor: the analysis of the inhibitor binding and description of the rigid body shift in the enzyme. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[18]  K. von Figura,et al.  Lysosomal enzymes and their receptors. , 1986, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  Fujii Tetsuya,et al.  Proteolytic processing sites producing the mature form of human cathepsin D. , 1992 .

[20]  L. Liotta,et al.  Cancer cell invasion and metastasis. , 1992, Scientific American.

[21]  P. Cresswell,et al.  Co-localization of molecules involved in antigen processing and presentation in an early endocytic compartment , 1990, Nature.

[22]  H. Geuze,et al.  Segregation of MHC class II molecules from MHC class I molecules in the Golgi complex for transport to lysosomal compartments , 1991, Nature.

[23]  S. Gulnik,et al.  Human liver cathepsin D. Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of a lysosomal enzyme. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  L. Liotta,et al.  Metalloproteinases and cancer invasion. , 1990, Seminars in cancer biology.

[25]  C. Abad-Zapatero,et al.  Inhibitor binding induces structural changes in porcine pepsin. , 1991, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[26]  R. Dickson,et al.  The role of cathepsin D in the invasiveness of human breast cancer cells. , 1993, Cancer research.

[27]  I. Mellman,et al.  The biogenesis of lysosomes. , 1989, Annual review of cell biology.