PATTERNS OF VARIATION IN LEVELS OF HOMOPLASY

Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy were explored through statistical analyses of standardized consistency indexes. Data were obtained from 60 recent cladistic analyses of a wide variety of organisms based on several different kinds of characters. Consistency index is highly correlated with the number of taxa included in an analysis, with homoplasy increasing as the number of taxa increases. This observation is compatible with a simple model of character evolution in which 1) the probability of character‐state change increases with the total number of branches in a tree and 2) the number of possible states of a character is limited. Consistency index does not show a significant relationship to the number of characters utilized in an analysis or to the taxonomic rank of the terminal taxa. When the relationship between consistency index and number of taxa is taken into account, there is no significant difference between plant and animal data sets in the amount of homoplasy. Likewise, the level of homoplasy in morphological and molecular data sets does not appear to differ significantly, although there are still too few molecular studies to be confident of this result. Future comparisons of consistency indexes, including studies along the lines established here, must take into account the influence of the number of taxa on homoplasy.

[1]  I. Kitching.  Spectacles and silver Ys: a synthesis of the systematics, cladistics and biology of the Plusiinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). , 1987 .

[2]  C. Guyer,et al.  Oadistic relationships among anoles (Sauria: Iguanidae) , 1986 .

[3]  C. Humphries,et al.  Cladistic and Biogeographic Analysis of Western Australian Species of Eucalyptus L'Hérit., Informal Subgenus Monocalyptus Pryor & Johnson , 1987 .

[4]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  Principles of systematic zoology , 1969 .

[5]  D. Wake,et al.  Multidimensional Analysis of an Evolving Lineage , 1987, Science.

[6]  K. Sytsma,et al.  CHLOROPLAST DNA EVOLUTION AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN CLARKIA SECT. PERIPETASMA (ONAGRACEAE) , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FOSSILS , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[8]  L. Herman.  Revision of Bledius. Part 4, Classification of species groups, phylogeny, natural history, and catalogue (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Oxytelinae). Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 184, article 1 , 1986 .

[9]  C. Erséus,et al.  PARSIMONY ANALYSIS OF THE PHYLOGENY OF SOME OLIGOCHAETA (ANNELIDA) USING SPERMATOZOAL ULTRASTRUCTURE , 1987, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[10]  D. Lipscomb.  THE EUKARYOTIC KINGDOMS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[11]  W. H. Wagner.  6. Applications of the Concepts of Groundplan-Divergence , 1984 .

[12]  Vernon Heywood,et al.  Principles of angiosperm taxonomy , 1964 .

[13]  E. Wiley,et al.  A critique of Wagner groundplan-divergence studies and a comparison with other methods of phylogenetic analysis , 1984 .

[14]  M. Miyamoto.  Biochemical Variation in the Frog Eleutherodactylus Bransfordii: Geographic Patterns and Cryptic Species , 1983 .

[15]  A. Larson,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL CORRELATES OF GENOME SIZE IN PLETHODONTID SALAMANDERS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR GENOME EVOLUTION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level , 1975 .

[17]  J. Felsenstein.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  J. Carpenter.  Choosing Among Multiple Equally Parsimonious Cladograms , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[19]  P. Stevens.  Evolutionary Classification in Botany, 1960-1985 , 1986, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum..

[20]  P. Crane.  PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN SEED PLANTS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[21]  J. Cracraft.  ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF CONTINENTAL BIOTAS: SPECIATION AND HISTORICAL CONGRUENCE WITHIN THE AUSTRALIAN AVIFAUNA , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  E. Ray Lankester,et al.  II.—On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and the distinction between homogenetic and homoplastic agreements , 1870 .

[23]  K. Bremer,et al.  MAJOR CLADES OF THE ANGIOSPERMS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[24]  R. Jansen.  Systematics of Spilanthes (Compositae: Heliantheae) , 1981 .

[25]  C. Meacham.  A probability measure for character compatibility , 1981 .

[26]  D. Hillis,et al.  EVOLUTION OF RIBOSOMAL DNA: FIFTY MILLION YEARS OF RECORDED HISTORY IN THE FROG GENUS RANA , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  S. Barrett,et al.  Phylogenetic Systematics of Pontederiaceae , 1986 .

[28]  C. Humphries,et al.  A cladistic study of Arillastrum, Angophora and Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) , 1983 .

[29]  D. Hillis,et al.  Molecular Versus Morphological Approaches to Systematics , 1987 .

[30]  B. Livezey.  Phylogeny and Historical Biogeography of Steamer-Ducks (Anatidae: Tachyeres) , 1986 .

[31]  F. Rasmussen,et al.  Monocotyledon evolution: characters and phylogenetic estimation , 1983 .

[32]  J. Gauthier.  Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds , 1986 .

[33]  J. Cracraft.  The origin and early diversification of birds , 1986, Paleobiology.

[34]  M. Miyamoto,et al.  PHYLOGENY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE LIZARD FAMILY XANTUSIIDAE , 1986 .

[35]  J. Farris,et al.  Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans , 1969 .

[36]  C. H. Nelson.  Numerical Cladistic Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationships in Plecoptera , 1984 .

[37]  B. Baum.  A phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Triticeae (Poaceae) based on morphological characters of the genera , 1983 .

[38]  B. Sillén-Tullberg,et al.  EVOLUTION OF GREGARIOUSNESS IN APOSEMATIC BUTTERFLY LARVAE: A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  J. Felsenstein.  Numerical Methods for Inferring Evolutionary Trees , 1982, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[40]  K. Bremer.  TRIBAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE ASTERACEAE , 1987, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[41]  J. Sites,et al.  Biochemical characters and the reconstruction of turtle phylogenies: relationships among batagurine genera , 1984 .

[42]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Variation and Evolution in Plants , 1951 .

[43]  D. Brooks,et al.  The Phylogeny of the Cercomeria Brooks, 1982 (Platyhelminthes) , 1985 .

[44]  Paul H. Harvey.  The Explanation of Organic Diversity: the Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating, Mark Ridley. Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press, Oxford (1983), viii, +272. Price £19.00 , 1984 .

[45]  C. Humphries,et al.  ON CLADISTIC RELATIONSHIPS IN GREEN PLANTS , 1987 .

[46]  J. Cane.  PRELIMINARY CHEMOSYSTEMATICS OF THE ANDRENIDAE AND EXOCRINE LIPID EVOLUTION OF THE SHORT-TONGUED BEES (HYMENOPTERA: APOIDEA) , 1983 .

[47]  L. Gottlieb,et al.  Genetics and Morphological Evolution in Plants , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[48]  J. Felsenstein.  Confidence Limits on Phylogenies With a Molecular Clock , 1985 .

[49]  J. Palmer,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS OF CHLOROPLAST DNA RESTRICTION SITE VARIATION IN THE MUTISIEAE (ASTERACEAE). , 1988, American journal of botany.

[50]  R. Vilgalys.  Phenetic and cladistic relationships in Collybia sect. Levipedes (Fungi: Basidiomycetes) , 1986 .

[51]  C. Campbell.  Phylogenetic Reconstructions and Two New Varieties in the Andropogon virginicus Complex (Poaceae: Andropogoneae) , 1986 .

[52]  R. Olmstead.  Phylogeny, Phenotypic Evolution, and Biogeography of the Scutellaria angustifolia Complex (Lamiaceae): Inference from Morphological and Molecular Data , 1989 .

[53]  S. Emerson.  Testing for historical patterns of change: a case study with frog pectoral girdles , 1988, Paleobiology.

[54]  J. Carpenter.  Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the Vespinae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 1987 .

[55]  B. Collette,et al.  INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF THE SPANISH MACKERELS (PISCES: SCOMBRIDAE: SCOMBEROMORUS) AND THEIR COPEPOD PARASITES , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[56]  O. Ryder,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the genus Equus. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[57]  K. Bremer.  THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  K. Sytsma,et al.  Chloroplast DNA evidence for the origin of the genus Heterogaura from a species of Clarkia (Onagraceae). , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  THE GENUS PEGOLETTIA (COMPOSITAE, INULEAE) , 1986 .

[60]  R. Huey,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES OF COADAPTATION: PREFERRED TEMPERATURES VERSUS OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE TEMPERATURES OF LIZARDS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[61]  R. Sokal,et al.  Character Stability in 39 Data Sets , 1985 .

[62]  D. Garbary,et al.  A cladistic analysis of Rhodophyta: Florideophycidean orders , 1987 .

[63]  Brent D. Mishler,et al.  Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism , 1982 .

[64]  W. J. Dickinson,et al.  THE USE OF REGULATORY PATTERNS IN CONSTRUCTING PHYLOGENIES , 1988 .

[65]  J. Farris.  A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting , 1969 .

[66]  P. E. Gibbs,et al.  A Phylogenetic Analysis of Higher Taxa in the Phylum Sipuncula , 1985 .

[67]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Form and function: structural analysis in evolutionary morphology , 1981, Paleobiology.

[68]  J. Felsenstein.  Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[69]  G. Lauder,et al.  Historical biology and the problem of design. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[70]  Christopher A. Meacham,et al.  9. Evaluating Characters by Character Compatibility Analysis , 1984 .

[71]  Michael J. Sanderson1.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: THE BOOTSTRAP REVISITED , 1989 .

[72]  W. Fink,et al.  A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Stomias, including the synonymization of Macrostomias , 1986 .

[73]  Michael J Sanderson,et al.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: THE BOOTSTRAP REVISITED , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[74]  Mark V. H. Wilson,et al.  The Gomphaeschninae (Odonata: Aeshnidae): new fossil genus, reconstructed phylogeny, and geographical history , 1986 .

[75]  B. Mishler,et al.  TRANSITION TO A LAND FLORA: PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE GREEN ALGAE AND BRYOPHYTES , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[76]  B. Baum.  11. Application of Compatibility and Parsimony Methods at the Infraspecific, Specific, and Generic Levels in Poaceae , 1984 .

[77]  B. Baum,et al.  Rusts (Uredinales) of Triticeae: evolution and extent of coevolution, a cladistic analysis , 1985 .

[78]  James W. Archie,et al.  METHODS FOR CODING VARIABLE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES FOR NUMERICAL TAXONOMIC ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[79]  J. Rodman,et al.  A Taxonomic Analysis and Revised Classification of Centrospermae , 1984 .

[80]  E. N. Arnold.  A cladisticization: phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. , 1989, Science.

[81]  C. Humphries,et al.  The use of nucleic acid sequence data in phylogenetic reconstruction , 1988 .

[82]  B. Rensch,et al.  Evolution above the species level , 1959 .

[83]  M. Novacek,et al.  Amino acid sequence versus morphological data and the interordinal relationships of mammals. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[84]  J. Polhemus,et al.  Analysis of Taxonomic Congruence among Morphological, Ecological, and Biogeographic Data Sets for the Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera) , 1980 .