Distributed Average Observation in Inverter Dominated Dynamic Microgrids

Consensus-based distributed average observation has been widely used in decentralized coordination among distributed generators (DGs) in inverter-based autonomous microgrids (MGs). However, its observation accuracy suffers from communication delays. Such observation errors are hard to detect and could deviate the system operation states (e.g., DG operating voltage) from their desired references. This work quantifies the relationship between communication delays and the steady-state observation errors of the delayed dynamic consensus algorithm. It is worth mentioning that system under study operates autonomously in the context of dynamic MGs. Compared to conventional MGs, dynamic MGs operate with reconfigurable cyber-physical networks. The observation errors are minimized by adopting the optimal system topology through cyber-physical network reconfiguration. Detailed control diagrams are designed to observe the average DG operating voltage in the physical networks, while measurements and control references are exchanged with communication delays through the cyber network. The proposed reconfiguration approach along with detailed controller designs are validated on a 12-bus test system in Simulink/MATLAB.

[1]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Distributed Consensus in Multi-vehicle Cooperative Control - Theory and Applications , 2007, Communications and Control Engineering.

[2]  Hao Tu,et al.  Dynamic Microgrids With Self-Organized Grid-Forming Inverters in Unbalanced Distribution Feeders , 2020, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics.

[3]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Sustainable and Resilient Distribution Systems With Networked Microgrids , 2020, Proc. IEEE.

[4]  Xinghuo Yu,et al.  Droop-Based Distributed Cooperative Control for Microgrids With Time-Varying Delays , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  Gabor Karsai,et al.  Resilient Information Architecture Platform for the Smart Grid: A Novel Open-Source Platform for Microgrid Control , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Bo Chen,et al.  Dynamic Microgrids in Resilient Distribution Systems With Reconfigurable Cyber-Physical Networks , 2021, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics.

[7]  Carlos R. P. dos Santos,et al.  Conditions for Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems With Time-Delays and Uncertain Switching Topology , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Distributed Secondary Control Strategy for Microgrid Operation with Dynamic Boundaries , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  A Framework for Load Service Restoration Using Dynamic Change in Boundaries of Advanced Microgrids With Synchronous-Machine DGs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Frede Blaabjerg,et al.  Autonomous Operation of Hybrid Microgrid With AC and DC Subgrids , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  R. Murray,et al.  Consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[12]  Jie Duan,et al.  To Centralize or to Distribute: That Is the Question: A Comparison of Advanced Microgrid Management Systems , 2018, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[13]  Jianguo Zhou,et al.  Consensus-Based Distributed Control for Accurate Reactive, Harmonic, and Imbalance Power Sharing in Microgrids , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Hui Yu,et al.  Accurate Consensus-Based Distributed Averaging With Variable Time Delay in Support of Distributed Secondary Control Algorithms , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  DYNAMIC CONSENSUS FOR MOBILE NETWORKS , 2005 .

[16]  Juan C. Vasquez,et al.  Secondary Frequency and Voltage Control of Islanded Microgrids via Distributed Averaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Research on Resilience of Power Systems Under Natural Disasters—A Review , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.