A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering

A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling approach is used to study the unsteady aerodynamics of the flapping wing of a hovering hawkmoth. We use the geometry of a Manduca sexta-based robotic wing to define the shape of a three-dimensional 'virtual' wing model and 'hover' this wing, mimicking accurately the three-dimensional movements of the wing of a hovering hawkmoth. Our CFD analysis has established an overall understanding of the viscous and unsteady flow around the flapping wing and of the time course of instantaneous force production, which reveals that hovering flight is dominated by the unsteady aerodynamics of both the instantaneous dynamics and also the past history of the wing. A coherent leading-edge vortex with axial flow was detected during translational motions of both the up- and downstrokes. The attached leading-edge vortex causes a negative pressure region and, hence, is responsible for enhancing lift production. The axial flow, which is derived from the spanwise pressure gradient, stabilises the vortex and gives it a characteristic spiral conical shape. The leading-edge vortex created during previous translational motion remains attached during the rotational motions of pronation and supination. This vortex, however, is substantially deformed due to coupling between the translational and rotational motions, develops into a complex structure, and is eventually shed before the subsequent translational motion. Estimation of the forces during one complete flapping cycle shows that lift is produced mainly during the downstroke and the latter half of the upstroke, with little force generated during pronation and supination. The stroke plane angle that satisfies the horizontal force balance of hovering is 23.6 degrees , which shows excellent agreement with observed angles of approximately 20-25 degrees . The time-averaged vertical force is 40 % greater than that needed to support the weight of the hawkmoth.

[1]  M. Jensen.  Biology and physics of locust flight. III. The aerodynamics of locust flight , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[2]  T. Weis-Fogh.  Energetics of Hovering Flight in Hummingbirds and in Drosophila , 1972 .

[3]  M. Cloupeau,et al.  Direct Measurements of Instantaneous Lift in Desert Locust; Comparison with Jensen'S Experiments on Detached Wings , 1979 .

[4]  J. Rayner.  A vortex theory of animal flight. Part 1. The vortex wake of a hovering animal , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  R. Edwards,et al.  The separation vortex in the Weis-Fogh circulation-generation mechanism , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  O. D. Vries.  On the Theory of the Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine , 1983 .

[7]  Geoffrey Spedding,et al.  The wake of a jackdaw (Corvus monedula) in slow flight , 1986 .

[8]  Marvin Luttges,et al.  Dragonfly unsteady aerodynamics - The role of the wing phase relations in controlling the produced flows , 1989 .

[9]  Peter Freymuth,et al.  Thrust generation by an airfoil in hover modes , 1990 .

[10]  P. Wilkin.  The instantaneous force on a desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae), flying in a wind tunnel. , 1990 .

[11]  Lonnie Branum,et al.  Model tilt-rotor hover performance and surface pressure measurement , 1990 .

[12]  J. Katz,et al.  Low-Speed Aerodynamics , 1991 .

[13]  Karl Gustafson,et al.  Computation of dragonfly aerodynamics , 1991 .

[14]  A. Brodsky.  Vortex Formation in the Tethered Flight of the Peacock Butterfly Inachis io L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and some Aspects of Insect Flight Evolution , 1991 .

[15]  D. J. Wells.  MUSCLE PERFORMANCE IN HOVERING HUMMINGBIRDS , 1993 .

[16]  S. Sunada,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL ‘NEAR FLING’ , 1993 .

[17]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[18]  P. Wilkin,et al.  Comparison of the Aerodynamic Forces on a Flying Sphingid Moth with Those Predicted by Quasi-Steady Theory , 1993, Physiological Zoology.

[19]  D. Grodnitsky,et al.  VORTEX FORMATION DURING TETHERED FLIGHT OF FUNCTIONALLY AND MORPHOLOGICALLY TWO-WINGED INSECTS, INCLUDING EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS ON INSECT FLIGHT , 1993 .

[20]  C. Ellington.  Unsteady aerodynamics of insect flight. , 1995, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[21]  Liu,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics study of tadpole swimming , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic model of flapping wings , 1996 .

[23]  Michael J. C. Smith,et al.  Simulating moth wing aerodynamics - Towards the development of flapping-wing technology , 1996 .

[24]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The wake dynamics and flight forces of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[26]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  C. Ellington,et al.  The three–dimensional leading–edge vortex of a ‘hovering’ model hawkmoth , 1997 .

[28]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.