Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods for microRNA profiling.

OBJECTIVES Exosomes are small membrane bound vesicles secreted by most cell types. Exosomes contain various functional proteins, mRNAs and microRNAs (miRNAs) that could be used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Currently, a standard method for serum exosome isolation is differential ultracentrifugation, but a search for alternative, less time-consuming and labour extensive exosomal isolation method for use in clinical settings is ongoing. The effect of serum exosome isolation method on obtained miRNA profile is not yet clear. The aim of this study was to determine to which extent selected exosome isolation methods influence the serum exosomal miRNA profile. DESIGN AND METHODS Exosomes were isolated from blood serum of healthy individuals by ultracentrifugation and ExoQuick Precipitation methods. The expression profile of 375 miRNAs was determined by real time PCR using Exiqon miRCURY LNA™ microRNA Human panel I assays. RESULTS Although a strong correlation of exosomal miRNA profiles was observed between the two isolation methods, distinct clusters of miRNA levels between the used methods were identified. The detected levels of two miRNAs, miR-92a and miR-486-5p, were significantly influenced by the exosome isolation method used. CONCLUSIONS Both exosome isolation methods are suitable for serum exosomal miRNA profiling. Differences found in miRNA patterns between the two methods indicate that the observed exosomal miRNA profile is slightly affected by the extracellular vesicle isolation method.

[1]  J. Lötvall,et al.  Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  She Chen,et al.  Characterization and proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer-derived exosomes. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[3]  Mahdieh Khosroheidari,et al.  Comparison of protein, microRNA, and mRNA yields using different methods of urinary exosome isolation for the discovery of kidney disease biomarkers. , 2012, Kidney international.

[4]  Winston Patrick Kuo,et al.  Impact of Biofluid Viscosity on Size and Sedimentation Efficiency of the Isolated Microvesicles , 2012, Front. Physio..

[5]  Cicek Gercel-Taylor,et al.  MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  W. Zacharias,et al.  Exosome isolation for proteomic analyses and RNA profiling. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[7]  Yoshiki Murakami,et al.  Comprehensive miRNA Expression Analysis in Peripheral Blood Can Diagnose Liver Disease , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  H. Baba,et al.  Clinical impact of serum exosomal microRNA‐21 as a clinical biomarker in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2013, Cancer.

[9]  S. Mathivanan,et al.  Exosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. , 2010, Journal of proteomics.

[10]  J. Klein,et al.  Microfiltration isolation of human urinary exosomes for characterization by MS , 2010, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[11]  Richard J Simpson,et al.  Comparison of ultracentrifugation, density gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods for isolating human colon cancer cell line LIM1863-derived exosomes. , 2012, Methods.

[12]  Anikó Szalai,et al.  Detection and isolation of cell-derived microparticles are compromised by protein complexes resulting from shared biophysical parameters. , 2011, Blood.

[13]  E. Kroh,et al.  Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Graça Raposo,et al.  Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.