Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatiotemporal patterns of uterine electrical activity in normal and arrested labors. STUDY DESIGN From a database of electrohysterograms, 12 subjects who underwent cesarean delivery for active-phase arrest were each matched with 2 vaginally delivered controls. Using 30-minute segments of the electrohysterogram during the arrest, or the same dilation in controls, the center of uterine electrical activity was derived. The vertical motion of this center of uterine activity was determined for each contraction and the frequencies of movement patterns analyzed. RESULTS Predominantly upward movement of the center of uterine activity (longer and/or stronger contraction at the fundus) was more common with normal dilation (P = .003). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis gave an area under the curve of 0.91 for predicting outcome (vaginal vs cesarean delivery). CONCLUSION There is a significant correlation between upward movement of the center of uterine activity (fundal dominance) and current labor progress.

[1]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: final data for 2004. , 2006, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[3]  N. Manassiev.  Head‐to‐cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  G. Saade,et al.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  S. R. Reynolds,et al.  A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF UTERINE CONTRACTILITY THROUGH SIMULTANEOUS RECORDING WITH AN INTERNAL AND A SEVEN CHANNEL EXTERNAL METHOD , 1950, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[6]  D. Rouse,et al.  Active Phase Labor Arrest: Revisiting the 2‐Hour Minimum , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Ofer Barnea,et al.  Continuous monitoring of cervical dilatation and fetal head station during labor. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Milorad Letić,et al.  Inaccuracy in cervical dilatation assessment and the progress of labour monitoring. , 2003, Medical hypotheses.

[9]  Gynecologists.  ACOG Practice Bulletin: No. 49, December 2003. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor , 2004 .

[10]  O. P. Tandon,et al.  Role of uterine artery velocimetry using color‐flow Doppler and electromyography of uterus in prediction of preterm labor , 2004, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[11]  P. Steer,et al.  Head‐to‐cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  Induction of Labour: Does Internal Tocography Result in Better Obstetric Outcome than External Tocography , 1993, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[13]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[14]  Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery , 2004 .

[15]  J. Crane.  Factors Predicting Labor Induction Success: A Critical Analysis , 2006, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  A. Hasenburg,et al.  External four‐channel tocography during delivery , 1994, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[17]  D. Seidman,et al.  Obstetric risk factors and outcome of pregnancies complicated with early postpartum hemorrhage: A population-based study , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[18]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  H. Minkoff,et al.  Intrauterine Pressure Wave Characteristics of the Upper and Lower Uterine Segments in Parturients With Active-Phase Arrest , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  A. Chang,et al.  Antepartum and Intrapartum Prediction of Cesarean Need: Risk Scoring in Singleton Pregnancies , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  K. Blakemore,et al.  Cephalopelvic disproportion is associated with an altered uterine contraction shape in the active phase of labor. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Augmentation of Labor: Does Internal Tocography Result in Better Obstetric Outcome Than External Tocography? , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Acog.  ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  First magnetomyographic recordings of uterine activity with spatial-temporal information with a 151-channel sensor array. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  J A Ward,et al.  Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  R. Omar,et al.  Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters to Predict the Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  E. Keeler,et al.  Lack of Progress in Labor as a Reason for Cesarean , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.