A comparison of monkey and human motion processing mechanisms

Single-cell recording studies have provided vision scientists with a detailed understanding of motion processing at the neuronal level in non-human primates. However, despite the development of brain imaging techniques, it is not known to what extent the response characteristics of motion-sensitive neurons in monkey brain mirror those of human motion-sensitive neurons. Using a motion adaptation paradigm, the direction aftereffect, we recently provided evidence of a strong resemblance in the response functions of motion-sensitive neurons in monkey and human to moving dot patterns differing in dot density. Here we describe a series of experiments in which measurements of the direction aftereffect are used to infer the response characteristics of human motion-sensitive neurons when viewing transparent motion and moving patterns that differ in their signal-to-noise ratio (motion coherence). In the case of transparent motion stimuli, our data suggest suppressed activity of motion-sensitive neurons similar to that reported for macaque monkey. In the case of motion coherence, our results are indicative of a linear relationship between signal intensity (coherence) and neural activity; a pattern of activity which also bears a striking similarity to macaque neural activity. These findings strongly suggest that monkey and human motion-sensitive neurons exhibit similar response and inhibitory characteristics.

[1]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  William Curran,et al.  The direction aftereffect is driven by adaptation of local motion detectors , 2006, Vision Research.

[3]  B Moulden,et al.  A Simultaneous Shift in Apparent Direction: Further Evidence for a “Distribution-Shift” Model of Direction Coding , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[5]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  S. Zeki,et al.  Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. , 1971, Brain research.

[7]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[8]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Seeing multiple directions of motion—physiology and psychophysics , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Motion adaptation in area MT. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[11]  Robert Patterson,et al.  Direction-selective adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  S. Treue,et al.  The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[14]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The different mechanisms of the motion direction illusion and aftereffect , 2007, Vision Research.

[15]  W. Curran,et al.  Monkey and humans exhibit similar motion-processing mechanisms , 2010 .

[16]  J. Movshon,et al.  Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  W. Curran,et al.  Monkey and humans exhibit similar motion-processing mechanisms , 2009, Biology Letters.

[20]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Freeman,et al.  Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  B. Treutwein Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[25]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[31]  T. Albright,et al.  Motion mechanisms in macaque MT. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  G. Orban,et al.  Laminar analysis of motion information processing in macaque V5 , 1989, Brain Research.

[33]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination , 1999, Vision Research.

[36]  C. Benton,et al.  New binary direction aftereffect does not add up. , 2006, Journal of vision.