Beyond the Stop-and-Go Assumption in Pulse-Doppler Radar Sensors

Coherent radars have multiple applications; among them, they can obtain images of targets. Unfortunately, the image quality can be seriously compromised for highly maneuvering targets, since the commonly adopted stop-and-go assumption is no longer valid for them. An approximated conventional explicit model for the signal delay, being proportional to the time-dependent target range, is usually employed to evaluate the violation of the stop-and-go simplification in these scenarios. Nevertheless, even this model can lead to radar-based measurement inaccuracies for extreme situations; for example, those involving very fast relative dynamics between the platform and target or for radars exploiting long-time-pulse waveforms. In this paper, an implicit function is proposed as the exact model for the radar echo time delay. Solutions for the conventional and exact models in the case of first- and second-order range polynomials are provided, and pertinent comparisons between them are accomplished. The main conclusion of this paper is that the conventional model is generally a good approximation to the exact solutions, but there may be extreme cases for which it does not give insight into the real appearing effects. Thus, the application of the exact model for the derivation of the radar round-trip delay could enable the conception of advanced radar-sensor algorithms, which improve the image quality for highly maneuvering targets. Simulated results of 1-D range profiles for a linear frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar example are also presented for verification of the expounded analytical equations.

[1]  Mateo Burgos-García,et al.  SAR System for UAV Operation with Motion Error Compensation beyond the Resolution Cell , 2008, Sensors.

[2]  Mengdao Xing,et al.  High resolution ISAR imaging of high speed moving targets , 2005 .

[3]  Jae-Hyun Choi,et al.  A Transceiver Module for FMCW Radar Sensors Using 94-GHz Dot-Type Schottky Diode Mixer , 2011, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[4]  F. Perez-Martinez,et al.  Helicopter Classification with a High Resolution LFMCW Radar , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Peter Hoogeboom,et al.  Modified range-Doppler processing for FM-CW synthetic aperture radar , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  L. G. Weiss Wavelets and wideband correlation processing , 1994, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Mark A. Richards,et al.  Principles of Modern Radar: Basic Principles , 2013 .

[8]  Jose-Maria Munoz-Ferreras,et al.  A Deramping-Based Multiband Radar Sensor Concept With Enhanced ISAR Capabilities , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[9]  N. S. Kopeika,et al.  W-Band Chirp Radar Mock-Up Using a Glow Discharge Detector , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[10]  Ian G. Cumming,et al.  Digital Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Algorithms and Implementation , 2005 .

[11]  Leo P. Ligthart,et al.  Signal Processing for FMCW SAR , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  D. Wehner High Resolution Radar , 1987 .

[13]  L.P. Ligthart,et al.  Correction of the effects induced by the continuous motion in airborne FMCW SAR , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar.

[14]  Christophe Magnard,et al.  Focusing of Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar Data From Highly Nonlinear Flight Tracks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  J. Kroszczynski Pulse compression by means of linear-period modulation , 1969 .

[16]  Changzhan Gu,et al.  Application of Linear-Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (LFMCW) Radars for Tracking of Vital Signs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[17]  David G. Long,et al.  Theory and Application of Motion Compensation for LFM-CW SAR , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.