The Design of Assistive Location-based Technologies for People with Ambulatory Disabilities: A Formative Study

In this paper, we investigate how people with mobility impairments assess and evaluate accessibility in the built environment and the role of current and emerging location-based technologies therein. We conducted a three-part formative study with 20 mobility impaired participants: a semi-structured interview (Part 1), a participatory design activity (Part 2), and a design probe activity (Part 3). Part 2 and 3 actively engaged our participants in exploring and designing the future of what we call assistive location-based technologies (ALTs) location-based technologies that specifically incorporate accessibility features to support navigating, searching, and exploring the physical world. Our Part 1 findings highlight how existing mapping tools provide accessibility benefits even though often not explicitly designed for such uses. Findings in Part 2 and 3 help identify and uncover useful features of future ALTs. In particular, we synthesize 10 key features and 6 key data qualities. We conclude with ALT design recommendations.

[1]  M Yousuf,et al.  Technological innovations in transportation for people with disabilities: workshop summary report: February 23, 2011 , 2011 .

[2]  B. Cardinal,et al.  ADA Compliance and the Accessibility of Physical Activity Facilities in Western Oregon , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[3]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Understanding Online Reviews: Funny, Cool or Useful? , 2015, CSCW.

[4]  Gerhard Weber,et al.  RouteCheckr: personalized multicriteria routing for mobility impaired pedestrians , 2008, Assets '08.

[5]  Khai N. Truong,et al.  CrossingGuard: exploring information content in navigation aids for visually impaired pedestrians , 2012, CHI.

[6]  Acsw John T. Pardeck.  Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 , 1997 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[8]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Combining crowdsourcing and google street view to identify street-level accessibility problems , 2013, CHI.

[9]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[10]  Georg Gartner,et al.  Applications of location–based services: a selected review , 2007, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[11]  Christian Menkens,et al.  EasyWheel - A Mobile Social Navigation and Support System for Wheelchair Users , 2011, 2011 Eighth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[12]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Mobile Tagging and Accessibility Information Sharing Using a Geospatial Digital Library , 2007, ICADL.

[13]  H. Matthews,et al.  Mapping for Wheelchair Users: Route Navigation in Urban Spaces , 2006 .

[14]  David Matthews,et al.  City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications , 2007 .

[15]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Participatory analysis: shared development of requirements from scenarios , 1997, CHI.

[16]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Improving public transit accessibility for blind riders by crowdsourcing bus stop landmark locations with Google street view , 2013, ASSETS.

[17]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  User sketches: a quick, inexpensive, and effective way to elicit more reflective user feedback , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[18]  Daniel J. Hruschka,et al.  Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research , 2004 .

[19]  Marc Rettig,et al.  Prototyping for tiny fingers , 1994, CACM.

[20]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[21]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  Geographic Information Science: Visualization, visual methods, and the geoweb , 2011 .

[22]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[23]  David Briggs,et al.  Modelling Access with GIS in Urban Systems (MAGUS): capturing the experiences of wheelchair users , 2003 .

[24]  H. Holone,et al.  Users Are Doing It For Themselves: Pedestrian Navigation With User Generated Content , 2007, The 2007 International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies (NGMAST 2007).

[25]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Tohme: detecting curb ramps in google street view using crowdsourcing, computer vision, and machine learning , 2014, UIST.

[26]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Focusing on Disability and Access in the Built Environment , 1998 .

[27]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[28]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  U-Access: a web-based system for routing pedestrians of differing abilities , 2006, J. Geogr. Syst..

[29]  S. Nesathurai,et al.  A pilot study of functional access to public buildings and facilities for persons with impairments , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[30]  Andrew Hudson-Smith,et al.  Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution , 2010, Ann. GIS.

[31]  John A. Fairlie,et al.  The United States Department of Justice , 1905 .

[32]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Zebra Crossing Spotter: Automatic Population of Spatial Databases for Increased Safety of Blind Travelers , 2015, ASSETS.

[33]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Authenticity, Relatability and Collaborative Approaches to Sharing Knowledge about Assistive Living Technology , 2015, CSCW.

[34]  Andrea Nuernberger,et al.  Presenting Accessibility to Mobility-Impaired Travelers , 2008 .

[35]  James A. Landay,et al.  Sketching Interfaces: Toward More Human Interface Design , 2001, Computer.

[36]  Richard L James R Church,et al.  Measuring Accessibility for People with a Disability , 2002 .

[37]  Amy Rauworth,et al.  Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[38]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Gary B. Wills,et al.  A survey of open accessibility data , 2014, W4A.