Evaluation of an anatomical based MAP reconstruction algorithm for PET in epilepsy

We studied the performance of an anatomical based maximum-a-posteriori reconstruction algorithm (A-MAP) for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in positron emission tomography (PET) of the brain of epilepsy patients. Between seizures, 2-[/sup 18/F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET shows a decreased glucose metabolism in gray matter (GM) associated with the epileptogenic region. However, detection of these regions is limited by noise in the measurement and the relatively small thickness of GM compared to the spatial resolution of PET. We hypothesized that incorporating anatomical information, derived from magnetic resonance imaging data, and pathophysiological knowledge in the reconstruction process improves the detection of hypo-metabolic regions. Monte-Carlo based brain software phantom experiments were used to examine the performance of A-MAP. The influence of small misregistration errors of the anatomical information and weight of the a priori information in GM were studied. A-MAP showed improved results for signal-to-noise ratio, bias and variance. A human observer study was performed, showing improved detection of hypo-metabolic regions using A-MAP compared to maximum-likelihood (ML) reconstruction. Finally, A-MAP was applied to clinical PET data of an epilepsy patient. We can conclude that the use of anatomical and pathophysiological information during the reconstruction process is promising for the detection of subtle hypo-metabolic regions in the brain of patients with epilepsy.

[1]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  J. Nuyts,et al.  A concave prior penalizing relative differences for maximum-a-posteriori reconstruction in emission tomography , 2000 .

[3]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Multimodality Bayesian algorithm for image reconstruction in positron emission tomography: a tissue composition model , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[6]  H. Lüders,et al.  Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Conrad V. Kufta,et al.  FDG‐Positron Emission Tomography and Invasive EEG: Seizure Focus Detection and Surgical Outcome , 1997, Epilepsia.

[8]  M. Defrise A factorization method for the 3D X-ray transform , 1995 .

[9]  C. Baumgartner,et al.  Nuclear medicine in the preoperative evaluation of epilepsy , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[10]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  The Use of Spectral Analysis to Determine Regional Cerebral Glucose Utilization with Positron Emission Tomography and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose: Theory, Implementation, and Optimization Procedures , 1994, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[11]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  G. Flint,et al.  Seizures and epilepsy. , 1988, British journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  A. Burgess Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[16]  F Fazio,et al.  Importance of partial-volume correction in brain PET studies. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[18]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.