The virtual accomplishment of knitting: How novice knitters follow instructions when using a video tutorial

Abstract Video tutorials have become more popular as a way for individuals with particular interests to learn practical manual skills. In video tutorials, the expert is not able to monitor the learner's progression, nor is the learner able to seek help from the expert when a particular problem arises. This means, among other things, that learners need to detect, diagnose and correct their errors without assistance from an expert. In this paper we focus on how this is accomplished by individuals attempting to learn how to knit by following instructions from a video tutorial. We show that novice knitters typically do not detect errors when introduced, but only when a first error has caused a number of subsequent incremental problems. Because novice knitters initially fail to identify and diagnose the underlying cause of their problems and have no one available to help them in this work, they tend to repeat the same error over and over again. We also demonstrate, however, that novice knitters eventually turn to the video tutorial as a kind of diagnostic tool; and that when they do so, they typically manage to diagnose and correct the initial error they made and succeed in the instructed task.

[1]  Nick Llewellyn Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology , 2014 .

[2]  Oskar Lindwall,et al.  The sequential analysis of instruction , 2015 .

[3]  P. Have Doing conversation analysis , 2007 .

[4]  Oskar Lindwall,et al.  Instruction-in-Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of a Manual Skill , 2012 .

[5]  I. Arminen,et al.  Multimodal production of second pair parts in air traffic control training , 2014 .

[6]  Oskar Lindwall,et al.  To follow the materials: The detection, diagnosis and correction of mistakes in craft education , 2014 .

[7]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[8]  L. Arnold Dialogic Embodied Action: Using Gesture to Organize Sequence and Participation in Instructional Interaction , 2012 .

[9]  Arnulf Deppermann,et al.  When recipient design fails: Egocentric turn-design of instructions in driving school lessons leading to breakdowns of intersubjectivity , 2015 .

[10]  Leelo Keevallik,et al.  Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction , 2010 .

[11]  Eric Laurier,et al.  The Graphic Transcript: Poaching Comic Book Grammar for Inscribing the Visual, Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Action , 2014 .

[12]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Learning how: the search for craft knowledge on the internet , 2009, CHI.

[13]  E. D. Stefani,et al.  Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions , 2014 .

[14]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[15]  Thad Dunning,et al.  Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences , 2012 .

[16]  English Emmenegger Patrick Dunning, Thad (2012): Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design­Based Approach. Cambridge: , 2012 .

[17]  Fritjof Sahlström,et al.  Learning as Longitudinal Interactional Change: From Other-Repair to Self-Repair in Physiotherapy Treatment , 2010 .

[18]  Inka Koskela,et al.  Trainer interventions as instructional strategies in air traffic control training , 2011 .

[19]  Marcus Sanchez Svensson,et al.  Embedding instruction in practice: contingency and collaboration during surgical training. , 2009, Sociology of health & illness.

[20]  K. Hakkarainen,et al.  Interaction and Embodiment in Craft Teaching , 2015 .

[21]  Leelo Keevallik,et al.  Having a ball: Immaterial objects in dance instruction. , 2014 .

[22]  Helena M. Mentis,et al.  Learning to see the body: supporting instructional practices in laparoscopic surgical procedures , 2014, CHI.