Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis

Electronic retinal prostheses seek to restore sight to patients suffering from retinal degenerative disorders. Implanted electrode arrays apply patterned electrical stimulation to surviving retinal neurons, producing visual sensations. All current designs employ inductively coupled coils to transmit power and/or data to the implant. We present here the design and initial testing of a photovoltaic retinal prosthesis fabricated with a pixel density of up to 177 pixels/mm2. Photodiodes within each pixel of the subretinal array directly convert light to stimulation current, avoiding the use of bulky coil implants, decoding electronics, and wiring, and thereby reducing surgical complexity. A goggles-mounted camera captures the visual scene and transmits the data stream to a pocket processor. The resulting images are projected into the eyes by video goggles using pulsed, near infrared (~900 nm) light. Prostheses with three pixel densities (15, 55, and 177 pix/mm2) are being fabricated, and tests indicate a charge injection limit of 1.62 mC/cm2 at 25Hz. In vitro tests of the photovoltaic retinal stimulation using a 512-element microelectrode array have recorded stimulated spikes from the ganglion cells, with latencies in the 1-100ms range, and with peak irradiance stimulation thresholds varying from 0.1 to 1 mW/mm2. With 1ms pulses at 25Hz the average irradiance is more than 100 times below the IR retinal safety limit. Elicited retinal response disappeared upon the addition of synaptic blockers, indicating that the inner retina is stimulated rather than the ganglion cells directly, and raising hopes that the prosthesis will preserve some of the retina's natural signal processing.

[1]  A Hofman,et al.  Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: Pooled findings from three continents. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[2]  E. Schmidt,et al.  "Safe" charge-injection waveforms for iridium oxide (AIROF) microelectrodes , 2003, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Gianluca Lazzi,et al.  In Situ Characterization of Stimulating Microelectrode Arrays: Study of an Idealized Structure Based on Argus II Retinal implants , 2009 .

[4]  B. Jones,et al.  Effect of shape and coating of a subretinal prosthesis on its integration with the retina. , 2009, Experimental eye research.

[5]  Stuart F Cogan,et al.  Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Interim Performance Results from the Second Sight® ArgusTM II Retinal Prosthesis Study , 2010 .

[7]  David H Sliney,et al.  Maximum permissible exposures for ocular safety (ANSI 2000), with emphasis on ophthalmic devices. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  M. Menaker,et al.  The circadian rhythm of body temperature. , 1992, Physiology & behavior.

[9]  A.M. Litke,et al.  What does the eye tell the brain?: Development of a system for the large scale recording of retinal output activity , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[10]  Keith Mathieson,et al.  High spatial resolution probes for neurobiology applications , 2009 .

[11]  S.F. Cogan In vivo and In vitro Differences in the Charge-injection and Electrochemical Properties of Iridium Oxide Electrodes , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  S.F. Cogan,et al.  Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Avi Caspi,et al.  Feasibility study of a retinal prosthesis: spatial vision with a 16-electrode implant. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Large-area microelectrode arrays for recording of neural signals , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  Marianne Haim,et al.  Epidemiology of retinitis pigmentosa in Denmark. , 2002, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[18]  R A Normann,et al.  The Utah intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[20]  J D Loudin,et al.  Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.