Vocational School Students' Information and Communication Technology Self-Efficacy Beliefs and the Factors Affecting their Use of Such a Technology

The purpose of vocational schools VSs in Turkey, which offer two-year degree courses, is to provide the students who have completed a high school programme successfully with practical introductory experience in skilled trades such as computing, electronics, mechanics, carpentry, construction, field crops, and so on. Those who complete a two-year VS degree successfully are also entitled to take the national exam to access the associate degrees so that they can study further two years and get a four year degree diploma instead of a two-year one. In this study, vocational school VS students' i.e., age 17/18 and above information and communication technology ICT self-efficacy beliefs and their level in use of certain common programmes at one of the colleges in the eastern part of Turkey were investigated in the spring of 2012. The study examined the VS students' a demographic background, b their ICT self-efficacy beliefs and c their ICT-using level in certain common programs. The VS students at four different departments i.e., two-year degree courses who were full-time were given the questionnaires to complete. 272 N=272 participants completed them. The study was both quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative results were analysed with SPSS i.e., descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Independent Samples Test. The qualitative data were analysed with examining the participants' responses gathered from the open-ended questions and focussing on the shared themes among the responses. The results revealed that the participants were ICT literate and users. They had positive ICT self-efficacy beliefs and their level in certain common programs was good. There were also statistical differences between their a ICT self-efficacy beliefs and b ICT level in certain common programs in terms of the length of ICT-use, the frequency of ICT-use, the place of ICT-access, and gender. The findings were consistent with the models and theories of technology engagement i.e., theory of technology acceptance, the theory of reasoned action, the decomposed theory of planned behaviour, and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, which recognise facilitating or inhibiting conditions. The implications are 1 to provide free full-access to ICT in terms of technology availability and efficient resources, 2 to provide free efficient ICT courses and 3 to integrate ICT into teaching/learning.

[1]  Namkee Park,et al.  University Instructors' Acceptance of Electronic Courseware: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Arif Altun,et al.  Undergraduate Students\u2019 Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Vehbi Turel The Use of Educational Technology at Tertiary Level , 2013 .

[4]  Cara L. Sidman,et al.  Online Learning and Instruction in Health: Addressing the Demands for Education and Training through Computer-Based Technologies , 2011 .

[5]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[6]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Thomas P. Van Dyke,et al.  Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  T. Downes,et al.  Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF): Building the ICT in education capacity of the next generation of teachers in Australia , 2012 .

[9]  Eng Guan Tay,et al.  Relating use of digital technology by pre-service teachers to confidence : a Singapore survey , 2012 .

[10]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Jennifer Duncan-Howell,et al.  Digital mismatch: Expectations and realities of digital competency amongst pre-service education students , 2012 .

[12]  Kevin R. Guidry,et al.  Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[15]  Vehbi Turel,et al.  Design of Language Learning Software , 2014 .

[16]  Geoffrey I Romeo,et al.  Engage, Empower, Enable: Developing a Shared Vision for Technology in Education , 2006 .

[17]  Vehbi Turel,et al.  Design of Feedback in Interactive Multimedia Language Learning Environments , 2013 .

[18]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Gürkan Yildirim,et al.  Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011 , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Damian Maher,et al.  Primary school teachers' use of digital resources with interactive whiteboards: The Australian context , 2012 .

[21]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[22]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Yuksel Goktas,et al.  Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade* , 2012 .

[25]  Peter Albion,et al.  Some Factors in the Development of Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Computer Use Among Teacher Education Students , 2001 .

[26]  Vassiliki I. Zygouris-Coe A Model for Online Instructor Training, Support, and Professional Development , 2014 .

[27]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  I. Erturk,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Online Assessment: A Case Study , 2004 .

[29]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption , 2013, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[30]  M. López-Pérez,et al.  The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context , 2013 .

[31]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[32]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[34]  W Fountain,et al.  Experience and beliefs of technology users at an Australian university: Keys to maximising e-learning potential , 2012 .

[35]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .