Quantitative Analysis of Food and Feed Samples with Droplet Digital PCR

In this study, the applicability of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for routine analysis in food and feed samples was demonstrated with the quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is currently used for quantitative molecular analysis of the presence of GMOs in products. However, its use is limited for detecting and quantifying very small numbers of DNA targets, as in some complex food and feed matrices. Using ddPCR duplex assay, we have measured the absolute numbers of MON810 transgene and hmg maize reference gene copies in DNA samples. Key performance parameters of the assay were determined. The ddPCR system is shown to offer precise absolute and relative quantification of targets, without the need for calibration curves. The sensitivity (five target DNA copies) of the ddPCR assay compares well with those of individual qPCR assays and of the chamber digital PCR (cdPCR) approach. It offers a dynamic range over four orders of magnitude, greater than that of cdPCR. Moreover, when compared to qPCR, the ddPCR assay showed better repeatability at low target concentrations and a greater tolerance to inhibitors. Finally, ddPCR throughput and cost are advantageous relative to those of qPCR for routine GMO quantification. It is thus concluded that ddPCR technology can be applied for routine quantification of GMOs, or any other domain where quantitative analysis of food and feed samples is needed.

[1]  Philippe Corbisier,et al.  Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[2]  Guillaume P. Gruère,et al.  A Review of International Labeling Policies of Genetically Modified Food to Evaluate India's Proposed Rule , 2007 .

[3]  M. Mura,et al.  Quantitation using informative zeros (QUIZ): Application for GMO detection and quantification without recourse to certified reference material , 2010 .

[4]  Benjamin J. Hindson,et al.  Evaluation of a Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Format for DNA Copy Number Quantification , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  L. Settanni,et al.  The use of multiplex PCR to detect and differentiate food- and beverage-associated microorganisms: a review. , 2007, Journal of microbiological methods.

[6]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[7]  L. Mazutis,et al.  Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Alexandra S. Whale,et al.  Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  S H Neoh,et al.  Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. , 1992, BioTechniques.

[11]  M. Maher,et al.  GUIDELINES ON PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND VALIDATION OF METHODS FOR DETECTION, IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC DNA SEQUENCES AND SPECIFIC PROTEINS IN FOODS , 2010 .

[12]  C. Foy,et al.  The applicability of digital PCR for the assessment of detection limits in GMO analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Application of next generation qPCR and sequencing platforms to mRNA biomarker analysis. , 2013, Methods.

[14]  V. Laval,et al.  A high-throughput multiplex method adapted for GMO detection. , 2008, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[15]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Theoretical uncertainty of measurements using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[16]  A. Holck,et al.  Determination of eight genetically modified maize events by quantitative, multiplex PCR and fluorescence capillary gel electrophoresis , 2008 .

[17]  K. Gruden,et al.  Detection of nonauthorized genetically modified organisms using differential quantitative polymerase chain reaction: application to 35S in maize. , 2008, Analytical biochemistry.

[18]  Jeff Mellen,et al.  High-Throughput Droplet Digital PCR System for Absolute Quantitation of DNA Copy Number , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Ie-Ming Shih,et al.  Principle and applications of digital PCR , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[20]  Arne Holst-Jensen,et al.  A statistical approach for evaluation of PCR results to improve the practical limit of quantification (LOQ) of GMO analyses (SIMQUANT) , 2008 .

[21]  Arne Holst-Jensen,et al.  Testing for genetically modified organisms (GMOs): Past, present and future perspectives. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[22]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  Diagnostic PCR: validation and sample preparation are two sides of the same coin , 2004, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[23]  M. Baker.  Digital PCR hits its stride , 2012, Nature Methods.

[24]  José Luis La Paz,et al.  A new PCR‐CGE (size and color) method for simultaneous detection of genetically modified maize events , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[25]  Tanja Dreo,et al.  Critical points of DNA quantification by real-time PCR--effects of DNA extraction method and sample matrix on quantification of genetically modified organisms. , 2006, BMC biotechnology.

[26]  P. Corbisier,et al.  Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize (Zea mays L.) by digital polymerase chain reaction , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.