Preparing Teachers to Use GIS: The Impact of a Hybrid Professional Development Program on Teachers’ Use of GIS

This article reports the findings of a 3-year study of a hybrid professional development program designed to prepare science and mathematics teachers to implement GIS in their classrooms. The study was conducted as part of the CoastLines Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers project funded by the National Science Foundation. Three cohorts of teachers participated in the program, with each participant receiving 40 h of synchronous online instruction and 80 h of in-person instruction and support over an 8-month period. Data from surveys of participants both before and after the program were analyzed using correlation, ordinary least squares, and ordered logit regression analyses. The analyses revealed increases in the self-reported frequency of GIS use and enhanced feelings of preparation, competence, community, and comfort with respect to using GIS for instruction. A composite index of all impact variables was positively influenced as well. The statistical analyses found a strong relationship between self-reported feelings of preparation and use of GIS. Some support was found for the idea that feelings of competence, community, and comfort were related to the teachers’ sense of preparation. The findings suggest that a robust hybrid model of teacher professional development can prepare teachers to use GIS in their classrooms. More research is needed to understand how hybrid models influence the sociopsychological and other dimensions that support teachers’ feelings of preparation to implement GIS.

[1]  K. Yoon,et al.  What Works in Professional Development? , 2009 .

[2]  A. Demirci.  Evaluating the Implementation and Effectiveness of GIS-Based Application in Secondary School Geography Lessons , 2008 .

[3]  Alejandro Mauricio Dávila Rubio.  Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005) Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD , 2017 .

[4]  Nancy M. Trautmann,et al.  Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology , 2013 .

[5]  Herbert H. Wideman,et al.  Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[7]  Michael Shriner,et al.  Social Studies Instruction: Changing Teacher Confidence in Classrooms Enhanced by Technology , 2010 .

[8]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[9]  L. Enochs,et al.  Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument , 1990 .

[10]  Iasonas Lamprianou,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Teacher Change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study , 2005 .

[11]  J. Kerski,et al.  Around the world with geospatial technologies , 2012 .

[12]  Bryan A. West.  Student Attitudes and the Impact of GIS on Thinking Skills and Motivation , 2003 .

[13]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge , 2001 .

[14]  Richard H. Audet,et al.  GIS Implementation Model for Schools: Assessing the Critical Concerns , 1997 .

[15]  R. Bednarz,et al.  Effect of GIS Learning on Spatial Thinking , 2009 .

[16]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[17]  Jonathan Brinkerhoff,et al.  Geographic Information Technologies + Project-Based Science: A Contextualized Professional Development Approach , 2003 .

[18]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation , 2007 .

[19]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[20]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Teaching for Understanding in Earth Science: Comparing Impacts on Planning and Instruction in Three Professional Development Designs for Middle School Science Teachers , 2009 .

[21]  N. Aharony,et al.  The effect of personal and situational factors on LIS students' and professionals' intentions to use e-books , 2014 .

[22]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  Karen Swan,et al.  Validating a Measurement Tool of Presen ce in Online Communities of Inquiry , 2008 .

[24]  Joseph J. Kerski,et al.  The Implementation and Effectiveness of Geographic Information Systems Technology and Methods in Secondary Education , 2003 .

[25]  Peggy Hauselt,et al.  Integration of Geospatial Science in Teacher Education , 2012 .

[26]  S. Bednarz,et al.  Geography Education: The Glass Is Half Full and It's Getting Fuller , 2004, The Professional Geographer.

[27]  P. Albion.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs as an Indicator of Teachers' Preparedness for Teaching with Technology , 1999 .

[28]  J. Edwards.  Ten Difference Score Myths , 2001 .

[29]  Nancy M. Trautmann,et al.  Flexibly Adaptive Professional Development in Support of Teaching Science with Geospatial Technology , 2010 .

[30]  Eui-kyung Shin.  Using Geographic Information System (GIS) to Improve Fourth Graders' Geographic Content Knowledge and Map Skills , 2006 .

[31]  C. Dede,et al.  A Research Agenda for Online Teacher Professional Development , 2009 .

[32]  Judith W. Meyer,et al.  GIS in the K‐12 Curriculum: A Cautionary Note , 1999 .

[33]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[34]  Daniel C. Edelson,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development in the Context of Curriculum Implementation , 2013 .

[35]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[36]  Nancy M. Trautmann,et al.  The Nature of Teacher Knowledge Necessary for the Effective Use of Geospatial Technologies to Teach Science , 2014 .

[37]  Richard H. Audet,et al.  The Status of GIS Technology in Teacher Preparation Programs , 1999 .

[38]  M. Patterson,et al.  Integrating Geographic Information Systems into the Secondary Curricula , 2003 .

[39]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[40]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Preparing Teachers to Design Instruction for Deep Understanding in Middle School Earth Science , 2009 .

[41]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[42]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Using video case studies to assess the impact of the use of GIS on secondary students’ spatial thinking skills Robert , 2011, GIScience 2012.

[43]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[44]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  Beyond Comparisons of Online Versus Face-to-Face PD , 2014 .

[45]  Alec M. Bodzin,et al.  A Research Agenda for Geospatial Technologies and Learning , 2015 .

[46]  Alec M. Bodzin,et al.  The Impact of a Geospatial Technology-Supported Energy Curriculum on Middle School Students’ Science Achievement , 2013 .

[47]  P. Alexander.  The Development of Expertise: The Journey From Acclimation to Proficiency , 2003 .

[48]  J. Bransford,et al.  How students learn : history, mathematics, and science in the classroom , 2005 .

[49]  Joseph J. Kerski,et al.  A National Survey to Examine Teacher Professional Development and Implementation of Desktop GIS , 2009 .

[50]  Ismail Sahin,et al.  From the Social-Cognitive Career Theory Perspective: A College of Education Faculty Model for Explaining Their Intention to Use Educational Technology , 2008 .

[51]  Sarah Witham Bednarz,et al.  Geographic Information Systems: A Tool to Support Geography and Environmental Education? , 2004 .