Imagining material versus geometric properties of objects: an fMRI study.

Two experiments are reported that used fMRI to compare the brain activation during the imagery of material and geometric object features. In the first experiment, participants were to mentally evaluate objects along either a material dimension (roughness, hardness and temperature; e.g., Which is harder, a potato or a mushroom?) or a geometric dimension (size and shape; e.g., Which is larger, a pumpkin or a cucumber?). In the second experiment, when given the name of an object and either a material (roughness and hardness) or geometric (size and shape) property participants rated the object on a scale from 1 to 4. Both experiments were designed to examine the underlying neural substrate that supports the processing of material object properties with respect to geometric properties. Considering the relative amount of activation across the two types of object properties, we found that (1) the interrogation of geometric features differentially evokes visual imagery which involves the region in and around the intraparietal sulcus, (2) the interrogation of material features differentially evokes the processing of semantic object representations which involves the inferior extrastriate region, and (3) the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) responds to shape processing regardless of whether the feature being queried is a material or geometric feature.

[1]  S. Lederman,et al.  Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M. Just,et al.  Mental rotation of objects retrieved from memory: a functional MRI study of spatial processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures , 1996, Nature.

[4]  J. Xiong,et al.  Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI: A comparison with positron emission tomography , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[5]  K Sathian,et al.  Feeling with the mind's eye: contribution of visual cortex to tactile perception , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  E. Deibert,et al.  Neural pathways in tactile object recognition , 1999, Neurology.

[7]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  M. Just,et al.  Graded Functional Activation in the Visuospatial System with the Amount of Task Demand , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Heller Visual and tactual texture perception: Intersensory cooperation , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  G. Gainotti,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: a critical survey. , 1995, Memory.

[12]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Human Cerebral Cortex: Localization, Parcellation, and Morphometry with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Freund,et al.  The role of the inferior parietal cortex in linking the tactile perception and manual construction of object shapes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the Tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Region of interest based analysis of functional imaging data , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Proceedings in Computational Statistics , 1998 .

[17]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[19]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R. Thouless Experimental Psychology , 1939, Nature.

[21]  N. Makris,et al.  MRI-Based Topographic Parcellation of Human Neocortex: An Anatomically Specified Method with Estimate of Reliability , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Imagined haptic exploration in judgments of object properties. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  P Servos,et al.  fMRI-derived cortical maps for haptic shape, texture, and hardness. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  T. Hendler,et al.  Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  R. Caselli,et al.  Rediscovering tactile agnosia. , 1991, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[28]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  P. Roland,et al.  Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Soledad Ballesteros,et al.  Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience , 2005 .

[31]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation , 1999, Nature.

[32]  M. Just,et al.  Collaborative Activity between Parietal and Dorso-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Dynamic Spatial Working Memory Revealed by fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[33]  S J Lederman,et al.  Cognitive Salience of Haptic Object Properties: Role of Modality-Encoding Bias , 1996, Perception.

[34]  S. Petersen,et al.  Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Picture Naming , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  C. Genovese,et al.  Functional Imaging Analysis Software — Computational Olio , 1996 .

[38]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images , 2000, NeuroImage.

[39]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Object recognition: The man who mistook his dog for a cat , 1996, Current Biology.

[40]  K Sathian,et al.  Mental rotation of tactile stimuli. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  C. Genovese,et al.  Statistical Issues in fMRI for Brain Imaging , 2001 .

[42]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Analogous neural models for tactual and visual learning , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  C. Davis Touch , 1997, The Lancet.

[45]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: An fMRI study , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[46]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[48]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perception : essays in honor of James J. Gibson , 1974 .