The influence of negative advertising frames on political cynicism and politician accountability

This research examined the influence of negative political advertising frames on the thoughts and feelings people generate in response to campaign advertising. Preparing and conducting this investigation involved the use of a multiple-method strategy. Content analysis identified two advertising frames (i.e., candidate theme and ad hoc issue advertisements) and two experiments separately induced political cynicism and politician accountability. Three hundred and sixty people participated in the experimental studies, in which they read and responded, using a thought-listing technique, to candidate theme or ad hoc issue negative advertisements. Results demonstrated that participants were more likely to generate cynical comments and hold politicians accountable for the country's ills when reading candidate theme advertisements than ad hoc issue advertisements. The results indicate that this contributes to a political climate of cynicism and may function to erode the electorate's overall trust in government.

[1]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  The role of belief accessibility in attitude formation , 1997 .

[2]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism , 1996 .

[4]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[5]  M. N. Goldstein,et al.  Political Cynicism: Measurement and Meaning , 1961, The Journal of Politics.

[6]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Going negative : how attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate , 1995 .

[7]  T. E. Patterson.  Out Of Order , 1993 .

[8]  L. L. Kaid,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertisements. , 1987 .

[9]  William Schneider,et al.  The Decline of Confidence in American Institutions , 1983 .

[10]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[11]  Michael Pfau,et al.  Attack Politics: Strategy and Defense , 1990 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  Michael Pfau,et al.  An expectancy theory explanation of the effectiveness of political attack television spots: A case study , 1992 .

[14]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[15]  S. Bates,et al.  The Spot: The Rise of Political Advertising on Television , 1984 .

[16]  Gina M. Garramone.  Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads , 1984 .

[17]  D. Easton.  A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support , 1975, British Journal of Political Science.

[18]  Harrell R. Rodgers.  Toward Explanation of the Political Efficacy and Political Cynicism of Black Adolescents: An Exploratory Study , 1974 .

[19]  James B. Lemert,et al.  DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .

[20]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Political Beliefs, Policy Interpretations, and Political Persuasion , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  Congress, the Press, and the Public , 1994 .

[22]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[23]  Montague Kern,et al.  30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties , 1989 .

[24]  M. Hewstone.  Causal Attribution: From Cognitive Processes to Collective Beliefs , 1989 .

[25]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Political Cynicism Revisited: An Information-Processing Reconciliation of Policy-Based and Incumbency-Based Interpretations of Changes in Trust in Government , 1990 .

[26]  A. Acock,et al.  Alternative measures of political efficacy: models and means , 1990 .

[27]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. , 1988 .

[28]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[29]  C. Ireland.  Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments , 1964 .

[30]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970 , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[31]  D. Easton,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Political Life , 1966 .

[32]  Negative narratives in 1988 presidential campaign ads , 1992 .

[33]  J. Mccroskey.  Scales for the measurement of ethos , 1966 .

[34]  Stuart H. Surlin,et al.  How Values Affect Attitudes Toward Direct Reference Political Advertising , 1977 .

[35]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[36]  C. Atkin,et al.  Effects of negative political advertising on the political process , 1990 .

[37]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items , 1990 .

[38]  Jerry L. Allen,et al.  Solidarity and sexual communication as selective filters: A report on intimate relationship development , 1996 .

[39]  S. Jackson,et al.  M>1: Analysis of Treatment x Replication Designs. , 1994 .

[40]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases , 1982 .

[43]  Larry Sabato,et al.  The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections , 1981 .

[44]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[45]  A. Acock,et al.  A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[46]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[47]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[48]  Philip H. Mirvis,et al.  The Cynical Americans: Living and Working in an Age of Discontent and Disillusion , 1989 .

[49]  J. Krosnick.  Attitude importance and attitude change , 1988 .

[50]  R. Niemi,et al.  Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study , 1991, American Political Science Review.