Automated Decision Making and Personal Data Protection in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Design Guidelines
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Luciano Floridi,et al. Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation , 2017 .
[2] Maria Virvou,et al. Adaptivity in scenarios in an educational adventure game , 2017, 2017 8th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA).
[3] John K. C. Kingston. Using artificial intelligence to support compliance with the general data protection regulation , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[4] T. Ross. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .
[5] Konstantina Chrysafiadi,et al. Evaluating the integration of fuzzy logic into the student model of a web-based learning environment , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..
[6] Seth Flaxman,et al. EU regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation" , 2016, ArXiv.
[7] Roslyn Layton. How the GDPR Compares to Best Practices for Privacy, Accountability and Trust , 2017 .
[8] Maria Virvou,et al. Based on GDPR privacy in UML: Case of e-learning program , 2017, 2017 8th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA).
[9] Viktor Wendel,et al. Personalization and Adaptation , 2016, Serious Games.
[10] Juan-Diego Zapata-Rivera. Adaptive, Assessment-Based Educational Games , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[11] Jiyou Jia,et al. Evaluating an Intelligent Tutoring System for Personalized Math Teaching , 2017, 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET).
[12] Konstantina Chrysafiadi,et al. Fuzzy Logic for Adaptive Instruction in an E-learning Environment for Computer Programming , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.
[13] Jan Smeddinck,et al. Personalized and Adaptive Serious Games , 2015, Entertainment Computing and Serious Games.