Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns

Accumulated research findings show that women tend to express higher levels of concern toward technology and the environment than do men, but that the tendency is not universal. The findings are particularly clear-cut for local facilities and/or nuclear and other technologies that are often seen as posing nisks of contamination; findings appear to be more mixed for broader patterns of environmental concern. Although the differing patterns have been reported with enough consistency to be considered relatively robust, less progress has been made to date in explaining the underlying dynamics. Five main hypotheses can be identified. One hypothesis, the expectation that increased knowledge will lead to decreased concern, has received so little support, despite repeated examination, that it can be discarded. Another, that women tend to express greater concern than do men about the health and safety implications of any given level of technological risk, has received consistent support. The remaining 3 hypotheses require additional empincal examination.

[1]  W. Freudenburg,et al.  Public Responses to Technological Risks: Toward a Sociological Perspective , 1992 .

[2]  T. Arcury,et al.  Environmental Worldview in Response to Environmental Problems , 1990 .

[3]  J. Russ,et al.  The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise , 1977 .

[4]  R. Trent,et al.  Sex Differences in Attitudes Toward New Energy Resource Developments. , 1982 .

[5]  A. Gouldner The Future Of Intellectuals And The Rise Of The New Class , 1980 .

[6]  C. Krauss Community struggles and the shaping of democratic consciousness , 1989 .

[7]  C. Jackson Women/nature or gender/history? A critique of ecofeminist ‘development’ , 1993 .

[8]  W. L. Rankin,et al.  Nuclear power and the public: an update of collected survey research on nuclear power , 1981 .

[9]  N. Weinstein,et al.  Agency Communication, Community Outrage, and Perception of Risk Three Simulation Experiments , 1993 .

[10]  Phil Brown,et al.  No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action , 1992 .

[11]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  A new species of trouble : explorations in disaster, trauma, and community , 1994 .

[12]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Public Reactions to Nuclear Power: Are There Critical Masses? , 1986 .

[13]  A. Hochschild,et al.  The Second Shift: Working Parents And The Revolution , 1990 .

[14]  S. Cable,et al.  WOMEN'S SOCIAL MOVEMENT INVOLVEMENT: , 1992 .

[15]  R L Goldsteen,et al.  STRESS IN THE COMMUNITY: A REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON THE ACCIDENT AT THREE MILE ISLAND * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Julie A. Rursch,et al.  The risks of "Putting the numbers in context": a cautionary tale. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Determinants of Risk Perceptions of a Hazardous Waste Site , 1992 .

[18]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[19]  L. Hamilton Who Cares about Water Pollution? Opinions in a Small‐Town Crisis* , 1985 .

[20]  Paul Mohai,et al.  Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism , 1992 .

[21]  G. Chow Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions (econometrics voi 28 , 1960 .

[22]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Citizens' views about the proposed Hartsville Nuclear Power Plant: a survey of residents' perceptions in August 1975 , 1977 .

[23]  L. Kay,et al.  Atomic energy or the atomic bomb; a problem in the development or morale and opinion. , 1949, The Journal of social psychology.

[24]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  Public reactions to nuclear waste : citizens' views of repository siting , 1994 .

[25]  W. Freudenburg Rural‐Urban Differences in Environmental Concern: A Closer Look* , 1991 .

[26]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[27]  Nuclear Power as a Feminist Issue , 1981 .

[28]  W. Freudenburg,et al.  Nuclear Reactions: Public Attitudes and Policies Toward Nuclear Power , 1985 .

[29]  D. Mileti,et al.  Psychosocial Effects of Hazardous Toxic Waste Disposal in Communities. , 1990 .

[30]  S. Rayner,et al.  How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice1 , 1987 .

[31]  Joachim Schahn,et al.  Studies of Individual Environmental Concern , 1990 .

[32]  E. Keller Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[33]  Stephanie L. Witt,et al.  Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: a Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the U.S , 1989 .

[34]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environment , 1989 .

[35]  D. J. Webber Is Nuclear Power Just Another Environmental Issue? , 1982 .

[36]  James H. Kuklinski,et al.  Citizen Knowledge and Choices on the Complex Issue of Nuclear Energy , 1982 .

[37]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks , 1992, Toxicologic pathology.

[38]  Jan A. J. Stolwijk,et al.  Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits , 1988 .

[39]  Susanna Hornig Gender Differences in Responses to News about Science and Technology , 1992 .

[40]  S. Iyengar,et al.  News That Matters: Television and American Opinion , 1987 .

[41]  Fern K. Willits,et al.  Environmental Attitudes and Behavior , 1994 .

[42]  I Savage,et al.  Demographic influences on risk perceptions. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  Margot Larocque,et al.  Ecofeminism : Women, Animals, Nature , 1993 .

[44]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[45]  Jack Arbuthnot,et al.  A Comparison of French and American Environmental Behaviors, Knowledge, and Attitudes , 1975 .

[46]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Stigma Happens: Social Problems in the Siting of Nuclear Waste Facilities , 1994 .

[47]  D. Eckberg,et al.  Environmental issues as women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards , 1989 .

[48]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[49]  C. Flynn LOCAL PUBLIC OPINION * , 1981 .

[50]  Trends in public attitudes toward air pollution. , 1967 .

[51]  N. Freudenberg Citizen action for environmental health: report on a survey of community organizations. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[52]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Viewing the World Ecologically , 1991 .

[53]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Attitudes and Stress in the Presence of Technological Risk: A Test of the Supreme Court Hypothesis , 1991 .

[54]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[55]  Thomas A. Arcury,et al.  Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain , 1987 .

[56]  Marvin F. Wideen,et al.  Environmental Quality , 1972 .

[57]  G. Breakwell,et al.  Factors Predicting Environmental Concern and Indifference in 13- to 16-Year-Olds , 1994 .

[58]  Adeline Gordon Levine,et al.  Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People , 1982 .

[59]  Alan Scott,et al.  Ideology and the New Social Movements , 2023 .

[60]  Klaus F. Zimmermann,et al.  Distributional conflicts in environmental-resource policy , 1986 .

[61]  A. Mushkatel,et al.  Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository: The Importance Of Trust , 1991 .

[62]  David A. Bella,et al.  ENGINEERING AND EROSION OF TRUST , 1987 .

[63]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions , 1993 .

[64]  Lola L. Lopes The Rhetoric of Irrationality , 1991 .

[65]  Lawrence C. Hamilton,et al.  Concern about Toxic Wastes , 1985 .

[66]  Pieter Jan M. Stallen,et al.  Public Concern About Industrial Hazards , 1988 .

[67]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  En-gendered fears: femininity and technological risk perception , 1992 .

[68]  Charles J. Brody,et al.  Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear Power , 1984 .

[69]  Irene Taviss,et al.  A Survey of Popular Attitudes toward Technology , 1972 .

[70]  Richard W. Stoffle,et al.  Risk Perception Shadows , 1988 .

[71]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[72]  D. Austin,et al.  Economic and environmental concerns as influences on growth attitudes: A research note , 1994 .

[73]  Charles A. Walker,et al.  Too Hot to Handle: Social and Policy Issues in the Management of Radioactive Wastes , 1983 .

[74]  Confidence in Science: The Gender Gap. , 1992 .

[75]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived risks of radioactive waste transport through Oregon: results of a statewide survey. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[76]  Michael R. Edelstein,et al.  Contaminated Communities: The Social And Psychological Impacts Of Residential Toxic Exposure , 1989 .

[77]  T. K. Pinhey,et al.  Rural-urban differences in support for environmental protection. , 1982 .

[78]  M. Fowlkes,et al.  Chemicals and Community at Love Canal , 1987 .

[79]  Hanspeter Kriesi New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  J. Petterson The Reality of Perception: Demonstrable Effects of Perceived Risk in Goiania, Brazil , 1988 .

[81]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[82]  V. Plumwood ECOFEMINISM: AN OVERVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF POSITIONS AND ARGUMENTS , 1986 .

[83]  Gerald Jacob,et al.  Site unseen : the politics of siting a nuclear waste repository , 1990 .

[84]  D. Sills,et al.  The Three Mile Island nuclear accident : lessons and implications , 1982 .

[85]  W. Burch,et al.  Social behavior, natural resources, and the environment , 1972 .