On the asteroid belt's orbital and size distribution

Abstract For absolute magnitudes greater than the current completeness limit of H -magnitude ∼15 the main asteroid belt's size distribution is imperfectly known. We have acquired good-quality orbital and absolute H -magnitude determinations for a sample of small main-belt asteroids in order to study the orbital and size distribution beyond H = 15 , down to sub-kilometer sizes ( H > 18 ). Based on six observing nights over a 11-night baseline we have detected, measured photometry for, and linked observations of 1087 asteroids which have one-week time baselines or more. The linkages allow the computation of full heliocentric orbits (as opposed to statistical distances determined by some past surveys). Judged by known asteroids in the field the typical uncertainty in the ( a / e / i ) orbital elements is less than 0.03 AU/0.03/0.5°. The distances to the objects are sufficiently well known that photometric uncertainties (of 0.3 magnitudes or better) dominate the error budget of their derived H -magnitudes. The detected asteroids range from H R = 12 – 22 and provide a set of objects down to sizes below 1 km in diameter. We find an on-sky surface density of 210 asteroids per square degree in the ecliptic with opposition magnitudes brighter than m R = 23 , with the cumulative number of asteroids increasing by a factor of 10 0.27 /mag from m R = 18 down to the m R ≃ 23.5 limit of our survey. In terms of absolute H magnitudes, we find that beyond H = 15 the belt exhibits a constant power-law slope with the number increasing proportional to 10 0.30 H from H ≃ 15 to 18 , after which incompleteness begins in the survey. Examining only the subset of detections inside 2.5 AU, we find weak evidence for a mildly shallower slope for H = 15 – 19.5 . We provide the information necessary such that anyone wishing to model the main asteroid belt can compare a detailed model to our detected sample.

[1]  et al,et al.  High-redshift quasars found in Sloan Digital Sky Survey commissioning data , 1999 .

[2]  Robert Jedicke,et al.  Collisional Models and Scaling Laws: A New Interpretation of the Shape of the Main-Belt Asteroid Size Distribution☆ , 1998 .

[3]  R. Greenberg,et al.  The collisional and dynamical evolution of the main-belt and NEA size distributions , 2005 .

[4]  R. Jedicke,et al.  The Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distributions of Main Belt Asteroids , 1998 .

[5]  Brett James Gladman,et al.  A highly automated moving object detection package , 2004 .

[6]  Alberto Cellino,et al.  The size distribution of main-belt asteroids from IRAS data , 1991 .

[7]  Joel Wm. Parker,et al.  THE CANADA–FRANCE ECLIPTIC PLANE SURVEY—L3 DATA RELEASE: THE ORBITAL STRUCTURE OF THE KUIPER BELT , 2009, 1108.4836.

[8]  Arlo U. Landolt,et al.  UBVRI Photometric Standard Stars in the Magnitude Range 11 , 1992 .

[9]  Martin Connors,et al.  Evidence for a Color Dependence in the Size Distribution of Main-Belt Asteroids , 2007 .

[10]  Robert Jedicke,et al.  Detection of Near Earth Asteroids Based Upon Their Rates of Motion , 1996 .

[11]  Alessandro Morbidelli,et al.  Orbital and temporal distributions of meteorites originating in the asteroid belt , 1998 .

[12]  R. Jedicke,et al.  Debiased Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distribution of the Near-Earth Objects , 2002 .

[13]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Subaru Main Belt Asteroid Survey (SMBAS)—Size and color distributions of small main-belt asteroids , 2007 .

[14]  High-redshift quasars found in sloan digital sky survey commissioning data. IV. Luminosity function from the fall equatorial stripe sample , 2000, astro-ph/0008123.

[15]  J. S. Dohnanyi Collisional model of asteroids and their debris , 1969 .

[16]  D. Vokrouhlický,et al.  Physical properties of asteroid dust bands and their sources , 2006 .

[17]  Robert Jedicke,et al.  The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt , 2003 .

[18]  P. Farinella,et al.  The Injection of Asteroid Fragments into Resonances , 1993 .

[19]  Robert Jedicke,et al.  Observational Selection Effects in Asteroid Surveys , 2002 .

[20]  Alberto Cellino,et al.  The Statistical Asteroid Model. I. The Main-Belt Population for Diameters Greater than 1 Kilometer , 2005 .

[21]  Z. Ivezic,et al.  Solar system objects observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey commissioning data , 2001 .

[22]  István Csabai,et al.  Comparison of Positions and Magnitudes of Asteroids Observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with Those Predicted for Known Asteroids , 2002 .

[23]  D. Padgett,et al.  Asteroid Trails in Hubble Space TelescopeWFPC2 Images: First Results☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[24]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Meteorite Delivery via Yarkovsky Orbital Drift , 1998 .

[25]  Francesco Marzari,et al.  The Missing Psyche Family: Collisionally Eroded or Never Formed? , 1999 .

[26]  吉田 二美 Size and spatial distributions of sub-km main-belt asteroids , 2002 .

[27]  Paolo Farinella,et al.  Asteroid collisional evolution: results from current scaling algorithms , 1994 .

[28]  Alberto Cellino,et al.  Reconstructing the Original Ejection Velocity Fields of Asteroid Families , 1996 .

[29]  David P. O'Brien,et al.  Craters on asteroids : Reconciling diverse impact records with a common impacting population , 2006 .

[30]  Richard P. Binzel,et al.  Asteroid collisional history - Effects on sizes and spins , 1989 .

[31]  The Origin of Planetary Impactors in the Inner Solar System , 2005, Science.

[32]  K. Lumme,et al.  Colorimetry and magnitudes of asteroids , 1979 .

[33]  P. Farinella,et al.  Wavy size distributions for collisional systems with a small-size cutoff , 1994 .

[34]  T. Gehrels,et al.  The Palomar-Leiden survey of faint minor planets , 1970 .

[35]  Paolo Tanga,et al.  On the Size Distribution of Asteroid Families: The Role of Geometry , 1999 .

[36]  Katja Nowick,et al.  The Origin of Planetary Impactors in the Inner Solar System , 2005 .