Resolution improvement in emission optical projection tomography

A new imaging technique called emission optical projection tomography (eOPT), essentially an optical version of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), provides molecular specificity, resolution on the order of microns to tens of microns, and large specimen coverage ( approximately 1 cubic centimetre). It is ideally suited to gene expression studies in embryos. Reconstructed eOPT images suffer from blurring that worsens as the distance from the axis of rotation increases. This blur is caused in part by the defocusing of the lens' point-spread function, which increases with object distance from the focal plane. In this paper, we describe a frequency space filter based on the frequency-distance relationship of sinograms to deconvolve the distance-dependent point-spread function and exclude highly defocused data from the eOPT sinograms prior to reconstruction. The method is shown to reduce the volume at half-maximum of the reconstructed point-spread function to approximately 20% the original, and the volume at 10% maximum to approximately 6% the original. As an illustration, the visibility of fine details in the vasculature of a 9.5 day old mouse embryo is dramatically improved.

[1]  S. Doran,et al.  A CCD-based optical CT scanner for high-resolution 3D imaging of radiation dose distributions: equipment specifications, optical simulations and preliminary results , 2001 .

[2]  Johnathon R. Walls,et al.  Foxh1 is essential for development of the anterior heart field. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[3]  W. Weninger,et al.  Phenotyping transgenic embryos: a rapid 3-D screening method based on episcopic fluorescence image capturing , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Michael A. King,et al.  Noniterative compensation for the distance-dependent detector response and photon attenuation in SPECT imaging , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jan Huisken,et al.  Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy , 2006 .

[6]  D. A. Christopher,et al.  Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  J. Hecksher-Sørensen,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002, Science.

[8]  M. Reddington,et al.  Surface imaging microscopy, an automated method for visualizing whole embryo samples in three dimensions at high resolution , 2002, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[9]  Jeffrey L. Wrana,et al.  Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development , 2004, Nature.

[10]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  High resolution gel-dosimetry by optical-CT and MR scanning. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  B. Flannery,et al.  Three-Dimensional X-ray Microtomography , 1987, Science.

[12]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[13]  J G Wolodzko,et al.  CCD imaging for optical tomography of gel radiation dosimeters. , 1999, Medical physics.

[14]  F. Del Bene,et al.  Optical Sectioning Deep Inside Live Embryos by Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy , 2004, Science.

[15]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Morphologic phenotyping with MR microscopy: the visible mouse. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Fourier correction for spatially variant collimator blurring in SPECT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  Joseph W. Goodman,et al.  Fundamental Limitations In Linear Invariant Restoration Of Atmospherically Degraded Images , 1976, Other Conferences.

[18]  James Sharpe,et al.  3D confocal reconstruction of gene expression in mouse , 2001, Mechanisms of Development.

[19]  N. Krstajić,et al.  Focusing optics of a parallel beam CCD optical tomography apparatus for 3D radiation gel dosimetry , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  B. C. Penney,et al.  A Wiener filter for nuclear medicine images. , 1983, Medical physics.