Use of electronic science journals in the undergraduate curriculum: An observational study

Phase 2 of a 2-phase project funded by the NSF–National Science Digital Library Project observed undergraduate and graduate engineering, chemistry, and physics students and faculty while they searched the ScienceDirect e-journals system for scholarly science journal articles for simulated class-related assignments. Think-aloud protocol was used to capture affective and cognitive state information, while online monitoring provided an automatic log of interactions with the system. Pre-and post-search questionnaires and a learning style test provided additional data. Preliminary analysis shows differences in search patterns among undergraduates, graduates, and faculty. All groups used basic search functions the most. Graduate students on average spent more time per session and viewed more pages. Further analysis, including analysis of affective and cognitive reactions is continuing.

[1]  Stephen P. Harter,et al.  Psychological Relevance and Information Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Database Use in Academic Libraries. , 1999 .

[3]  Debora Shaw Undergraduate Use of CD-ROM Databases: Observations of Human-Computer Interaction and Relevance Judgments , 1996 .

[4]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part II. Results of a Design Study , 1982, J. Documentation.

[5]  W. David Penniman,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation of on-line information system usage , 1980, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the Humanities: Report No. 6: Overview and Conclusions , 1996 .

[7]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  John N. Berry The Valley Library, Oregon State University: 1999 Library of the Year. , 1999 .

[9]  Susan Siegfried,et al.  An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1 , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[10]  Peiling Wang,et al.  Methodologies and Methods for User Behavioral Research. , 1999 .

[11]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The use of computer-monitored data in information science and communication research , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[13]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Undergraduate science students and electronic scholarly journals , 2005, ASIST.

[14]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. , 1992 .

[15]  Steve Jones,et al.  The Internet Goes to College , 2002 .

[16]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia , 1989, JASIS.

[17]  G. Southworth,et al.  Overview and conclusions , 2003 .

[18]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Seeking Meaning: a process approach to library and information services" Ablex Publishing , 2003 .

[19]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A Profile of End-User Searching Behavior by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A profile of end‐user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993 .

[21]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.

[22]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Rethinking Online Monitoring Methods for Information Retrieval Systems: From Search Product to Search Process , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Betty K. Oldroyd,et al.  Study of strategies used in on‐line searching , 1977 .

[24]  David Ellis,et al.  The Physical and Cognitive Paradigms in Information Retrieval Research , 1992, J. Documentation.