Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction with the volume penalization method

We present a novel scheme for the numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction problems. It extends the volume penalization method, a member of the family of immersed boundary methods, to take into account flexible obstacles. We show how the introduction of a smoothing layer, physically interpreted as surface roughness, allows for arbitrary motion of the deformable obstacle. The approach is carefully validated and good agreement with various results in the literature is found. A simple one-dimensional solid model is derived, capable of modeling arbitrarily large deformations and imposed motion at the leading edge, as it is required for the simulation of simplified models for insect flight. The model error is shown to be small, while the one-dimensional character of the model features a reasonably easy implementation. The coupled fluid-solid interaction solver is shown not to introduce artificial energy in the numerical coupling, and validated using a widely used benchmark. We conclude with the application of our method to models for insect flight and study the propulsive efficiency of one and two wing sections.

[1]  Toshiyuki Nakata,et al.  A fluid-structure interaction model of insect flight with flexible wings , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Two-dimensional simulation of the fluttering instability using a pseudospectral method with volume penalization , 2013 .

[3]  van Eh Harald Brummelen,et al.  A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction , 2004 .

[4]  Is the CFL Condition Sufficient? Some Remarks , 2013 .

[5]  Xiaojue Zhu,et al.  Numerical study on hydrodynamic effect of flexibility in a self-propelled plunging foil , 2014 .

[6]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Modeling of Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2001 .

[7]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS , 2005 .

[8]  Silas Alben,et al.  Simulating the dynamics of flexible bodies and vortex sheets , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  H. K. Moffatt,et al.  Evolution of the Leading-Edge Vortex over an Accelerating Rotating Wing , 2013 .

[10]  A. Alexeev,et al.  Free swimming of an elastic plate plunging at low Reynolds number , 2014 .

[11]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[12]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional numerical simulations of the clap–fling–sweep of hovering insects , 2010 .

[13]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Approximation of the Laplace and Stokes operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions through volume penalization: a spectral viewpoint , 2012, Numerische Mathematik.

[14]  Chongam Kim,et al.  Aerodynamic Effects of Structural Flexibility in Two-Dimensional Insect Flapping Flight , 2011 .

[15]  C. Canuto Spectral methods in fluid dynamics , 1991 .

[16]  Lisandro Dalcin,et al.  Strong coupling strategy for fluid–structure interaction problems in supersonic regime via fixed point iteration , 2009 .

[17]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Numerical simulation of the transient flow behaviour in chemical reactors using a penalisation method , 2005 .

[18]  Xiaolei Yang,et al.  A smoothing technique for discrete delta functions with application to immersed boundary method in moving boundary simulations , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  C. Peskin Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[20]  Carlos A. de Moura,et al.  The Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) Condition , 2013 .

[21]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[22]  B. Balachandran,et al.  Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  D. Wan,et al.  An Efficient Multigrid FEM Solution Technique for Incompressible Flow with Moving Rigid Bodies , 2004 .

[24]  J. Pederzani,et al.  A numerical method for the analysis of flexible bodies in unsteady viscous flows , 2006 .

[25]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Numerical Modelling of Flexible Heaving Foils , 2013 .

[26]  Beverley J. Glover,et al.  Vortex shedding model of a flapping flag , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Philippe Angot,et al.  A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows , 1999, Numerische Mathematik.

[28]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Computer Modeling and Analysis of the Orion Spacecraft Parachutes , 2011 .

[29]  Rolf Stenberg,et al.  Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2017 , 2019, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[30]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  C-start: optimal start of larval fish , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  Angelo Iollo,et al.  Modeling and simulation of fish-like swimming , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[33]  David Lentink,et al.  The Scalable Design of Flapping Micro-Air Vehicles Inspired by Insect Flight , 2010, Flying Insects and Robots.

[34]  C. Peskin,et al.  Simulation of a Flapping Flexible Filament in a Flowing Soap Film by the Immersed Boundary Method , 2002 .

[35]  M. Uhlmann An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows , 2005, 1809.08170.

[36]  Dmitry Kolomenskiy,et al.  A Fourier spectral method for the Navier-Stokes equations with volume penalization for moving solid obstacles , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[37]  G. Hou,et al.  Numerical Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction — A Review , 2012 .

[38]  K. Bathe,et al.  A mesh adaptivity procedure for CFD and fluid-structure interactions , 2009 .

[39]  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann,et al.  Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[40]  T. Wick Fluid-structure interactions using different mesh motion techniques , 2011 .

[41]  Ramiro Godoy-Diana,et al.  Behind the performance of flapping flyers , 2010 .

[42]  Stefan Turek,et al.  Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction: A Comparison of Different Discretization and Solution Approaches , 2011 .

[43]  E. Ramm,et al.  Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows , 2007 .

[44]  Michael Schäfer,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on a laminar fluid-structure interaction reference test case , 2011 .

[45]  Hao Liu,et al.  Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity , 2010 .

[46]  C. Peskin,et al.  Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[47]  A. Monin,et al.  Statistical fluid mechanics: Mechanics of turbulence. Volume 2 /revised and enlarged edition/ , 1975 .

[48]  Claudio Canuto,et al.  Spectral Methods: Evolution to Complex Geometries and Applications to Fluid Dynamics (Scientific Computation) , 2007 .

[49]  Mao Sun,et al.  Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[50]  R. Mittal,et al.  Time-Varying Wing-Twist Improves Aerodynamic Efficiency of Forward Flight in Butterflies , 2013, PloS one.

[51]  Gilles Carbou,et al.  Boundary layer for a penalization method for viscous incompressible flow , 2003, Advances in Differential Equations.

[52]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  3-D Parachute simulation by the immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[53]  Michael Schäfer,et al.  Efficiency and accuracy of fluid-structure interaction simulations using an implicit partitioned approach , 2008 .

[54]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Flying Insects and Robots , 2010 .

[55]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems , 2005 .

[56]  Toshiyuki Nakata,et al.  Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  Joakim Becker,et al.  A second order backward difference method with variable steps for a parabolic problem , 1998 .

[58]  E. Oñate,et al.  A monolithic Lagrangian approach for fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[59]  D. Dinkler,et al.  A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction using space–time finite elements , 2004 .

[60]  W. Wall,et al.  Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation , 2008 .

[61]  Jérôme Casas,et al.  Force balance in the take-off of a pierid butterfly: relative importance and timing of leg impulsion and aerodynamic forces , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[62]  S. Michelin,et al.  Resonance and propulsion performance of a heaving flexible wing , 2009, 0906.2804.